Ah, yes, well, I was absolutely with you on that aspect, Mark.
It was an odd read.
Doug
On 15-May-09, at 10:57 AM, Mark Weiss wrote:
> I know, Doug. I was just having fun. It's what comes before that's
> the real meat. What exactly is she talking about? That she engaged
> in a civil action against the university for not protecting her from
> Walcott's harassment so that he could have his day in court and
> prove that he hadn't harassed her? When it should have been clear to
> a child that, even if any of that made any sense, the university's
> lawyers would never allow him to testify in the unlikely event that
> it didn't settle.
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
Latest books:
Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
and this is 'life' and we owe at least this much
contemplation to our western fact: to Rise,
Decline, Fall, to futility and larks,
to the bright crustaceans of the oversky.
Phyllis Webb
|