JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  May 2009

PHD-DESIGN May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Service Design

From:

Nicola Morelli <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nicola Morelli <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 2 May 2009 08:29:22 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (147 lines)

HI David and all,
I suspect the question David asked, in the terms he asked it, covers just a small part of design research on services. Understanding the ROI in terms of how design would improve the quality of existing services is a legitimate question, that concern the redesign of existing services or processes in the back office of existing services, or experiences in the front office. But in more general terms design and service design can offer an opportunity for improvement in wider area, for instance they can offer the opportunity to product manufacturer to improve the quality of their offering by introducing service component. Furthermore research on service design can (and in fact is) suggesting new scenarios for the provision of public services (e.g. the taxation service in Australia, or the military services as David was suggesting) and the re-organisation of public policies (see the UK government programmatic documents on public services [1], which, in my opinion, has been heavily influenced by the activity of the Design council and some service designers).
Of course at this point the question of the boundaries for the profession of designers and for design appears more urgent, although I feel that whatever boundary we fix we discover soon after we have fixed them that there is something more interesting beyond them.
The other question concern the definition of what we should consider as ROI when the client is no longer a service company and, above all, when the client is a public institution. In this last case a mere economic calculation is always possible, but it is definitely a very narrow perspective on the benefit an appropriate service design can provide to citizens.

So I would take David question as the initial question, which need revisions, because service design research (as in fact any research on innovation) before answering the existing open question, tends to re-frame the questions altogether.

Ciao
Nicola


(1) United Kingdom Prime Minister Strategy Unit (2007). Building on progress: Public services. HM Government Policy Review, Government of United Kingdom.

Nicola Morelli, PhD
Associate Professor, School of Architecture and Design
Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
http://servicedesign.wikispaces.com/
Blog http://nicomorelli.wordpress.com/
skype: nicomorelli


-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Sless
Sent: 2. maj 2009 06:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Service Design

Hi Folks,

I'm back on this thread which I had to drop out of a couple of weeks  
ago. I am, as some of you know, always juggling between my  
responsibilities to CRI and my responsibilities to a wider  
intellectual community. Sometimes these things run together, sometimes- 
as happened in the last couple of weeks-they do not. Also, I wanted to  
reread some of the recent writing on service design with those  
questions in mind. It all takes time.

To briefly backtrack. I asked three questions about the emerging  
'designerly' interest in service design:

> 1. What evidence is being offered to business by Service Designers  
> on the potential for Service Design to offer a return on investment  
> (ROI)
> 2. How do Service Designers go about delimiting or changing the  
> boundary of the Service they design
> 3. Are there limits to the complexity of a Service beyond which a  
> designer cannot exercise control.

Having gone through some of the literature and taken account of some  
of the comments made about my questions on the list, I've come to the  
view that these questions remain largely unanswered from a design  
research perspective. This is not to say that there is not a range of  
opinion out there variously claiming that the questions have been  
answered to the claim that these are the wrong questions to ask. My  
own opinion is that these questions are legitimate and largely  
neglected within the design research community. I also think that  
these are critically important questions for design practice.

But to pick up on a couple of points made by GK:
> I always enjoy seeing my friend David Sless dropping into  
> conversations on various lists wisely pointing out repeating  
> starting point initiatives and provocatively tossing in the hand  
> grenade of "where's the ROI beef" however I think the bigger  
> question for the service design folks is what happens when the  
> challenge has nothing to do with service....for citizens, for  
> organizations, for societies?

I would not disagree with GK, particularly when he claims that I am  
wise! Nor would I disagree with him about the emphasis on citizens and  
the wider society. But that is a question of boundary shifting and  
simply begs the question I ask about boundary shifting. The point,  
however, is not whether GK or I think the 'bigger' question is more  
important, the question is for those designers who want to claim that  
applying their know-how leads to 'improvements' in service delivery.  
In this regard, ROI can be interpreted narrowly, in a financial sense,  
or more broadly and more interestingly, in an aesthetic or social  
sense. But there is here a legitimate research question. If part of  
the professional offering by designers claims, as it frequently does  
in the published literature, that design leads to 'improvements' ,  
then it is legitimate to ask "improvement from what to what"?

This may be an awkward question, but it is perfectly legitimate, even  
if there are better and more important questions to ask.

GK goes on to comment"
> By the way David: If your clients are asking that you define what  
> you do in the context of how your services will pay for themselves  
> you probably need to update your go-to-market strategy and likely  
> even your services..:-) Those kinds of questions are signs that your  
> industry in your market is being rapidly commoditized. Just another  
> sign that it is not going to be possible not to change. Change is  
> not a theoretical idea today, its a necessity. Welcome to  
> globalization.

Lots of misunderstanding here.

First, it's not primarily a question our 'clients' ask. I put  
'clients' in inverted commas because we (CRI) are a not-for profit- 
membership body, and the organisations we work with are always Members  
of our Institute. This inflects the normal client/designer  
relationship into a different set of obligations, rights and  
responsibilities. Primarily, we are the ones that ask this question,  
and we do so as researchers interested in improving design practice.  
That is our charter, our mission, if you will. It's written into our  
constitution.

Second, we are continually updating
> our go-to-market strategy and our services..:-)
And we do so based on the evidence we collect from our research into  
such things as measuring ROI and other parameters which enable us to  
discover and then offer  approaches to design that are better than  
others within particular problem domains and at particular stages in  
the design process.

Third, these questions are not a sign of something being commodotized,  
rather they are a sign of constant change driven by evidence from  
practice and research. Of course we are all in a state of continual  
change. Welcome to the real world, global or otherwise! The issue  
about change is what drives it: blind ignorance, faith or fashion; or  
evidence that change is desirable, achievable and that those who make  
the changes are accountable to the rest of us.

To return to the issue of Service Design. One of the most interesting  
service changes taking place in our society over the last fifty years  
is taking place in the military, where soldiers are being increasingly  
trained for peace keeping rather than warfare. In our own Country,  
Australia and a few others, this has been going on for some time.  
There is a long way to go in this in many countries. It's not long  
since when asked the question, the Pentagon's standard reply was: 'We  
don't do Peace in the Pentagon'! Change happens everywhere.

But I would have though in this area of service design, as in any  
other there are questions of ROI, problems of Boundary shifting, (both  
literal and metaphorical), and contingency planning for things beyond  
ones control. All, I would argue, legitimate questions for design  
research.

The simple point of my questions was to find out if other design  
researchers are asking these questions. Following this thread, I have  
come to the view that many are not.

David
-- 

blog: www.communication.org.au/dsblog
web: http://www.communication.org.au

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager