JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  April 2009

CRISIS-FORUM April 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Don’t Blame Oil, Developed Nations Are Responsible ..... what if?

From:

John Scull <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Scull <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:33:11 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (190 lines)

Hi Corneilius,

Yes, it's good to be reminded that, even without the climate crisis, the 
world is in trouble, and from Blake's "dark satanic mills" to Carson's 
"silent spring," perceptive social critics have been aware of it.  To use an 
industrial metaphor, we are all passengers on a runaway train without a 
driver, or perhaps with a bunch of drivers arguing about how the brakes 
work.

John
=========================
John Scull
http://members.shaw.ca/jscull
“I believe a leaf of grass is no less than the journey-work of the stars.”
                                                    --Walt Whitman

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Corluminous" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Don’t Blame Oil, Developed Nations Are Responsible ..... what 
if?


What if the Carbon Climate Change driver concept is an attempt to undermine 
OPEC?

What if the truth is that the fundamental processes of Industrialism are at 
the root of the toxicity of our 'developed' culture, because these processes 
DO NOT RETURN NUTRIENTS to nature for more life to utilise those nutrients, 
safely, in a balanced way, and instead we are slowly poisoning all of that 
which we live in?

What if the truth is that Indsutrialism is fundamentally a malign 
dictatorship, and willing to obliterate millions of people, plants and 
animals in an insane desire to 'protect' itself?

What if these truths more than any other define this culture?

Who would benefit in the short-term, from avoiding these truths, from many 
people being distracted by Carbon Trading, and Green Developement, and an 
Imaginary Islamic Fundamentalist War on the West, or by Jade Goodys public 
death?

Kindest regards



Corneilius



www.corneilius.net



"do what you love it's your gift to the universe!"



note : if you do not wish to receive further emails from 
[log in to unmask] please reply with blamk email and "remove me" in the 
subject field.

--- On Mon, 6/4/09, Torsten Mark Kowal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: Torsten Mark Kowal <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Don’t  Blame Oil, Developed Nations Are Responsible for Climate 
Change, Says OPEC
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Monday, 6 April, 2009, 10:46 PM





Don’t Blame Oil, Developed Nations Are Responsible for Climate Change,
Says
OPEC




Written by
Mridul
Chadha Published on April 4th, 2009







The OPEC Secretary General has said that

oil is not responsible for climate change and that the developed
nations should be held responsible for the global predicament we all face
today.

Oil is not responsible. It is the
industrialised countries which are making all this pollution in the
world.

These were the words of Abdullah al-Badri at the International Oil
Summit held at Paris. He went on to criticize ’some’ developed nations
levying excessive taxes on oil companies and petroleum products while
extending tax breaks to renewable energy firms. He also spoke against the
subsidies that the renewable energy projects recieve in the developed
countries.


It is highly unfortunate to see OPEC’s single-minded and illogical stance
regarding climate change and renewable energy.


The developed nations have started to move their power generation systems
from being fossil fuel based to renewable energy centred systems.
However, hybrids and

electric cars are still expensive and with the car industry going
through catastrophic period of sales, it is unlikely that they would be
able to mass-produce an affordable low emission vehicle. Thus gasoline
burning cars and trucks remain a major source of world’s carbon
emissions.


The oil companies which the OPEC is supporting are the same which exited
the lucrative renewable energy markets of Europe to ’set up profitable
projects’ across the Atlantic. Under the Bush administration when the
prospects of renewable energy in the US were not as bright as they are
now, companies like

Shell and

British Petroleum, quit renewable energy projects in the UK and

Asia to look for markets which provided ‘better
profitibility’.


On one hand, the OPEC opposes the subsidies being given to renewable
energy projects and on other hand wants the developed nations to adapt to
climate change, without reducing their oil consumption. Clearly OPEC is
scared of the world turning its back on it and fears a gradual global
decline in oil demand. OPEC also seems to be concerned by the billions of
dollars of

green

energy project investments pledged by world leaders. It is running
out of reasons to convince the world to continue using oil at the same
rate as it used to some decades ago. World’s oil addiction is in the
interest of oil exporting nations but it could spell doom for the rest of
the world.


Europe has already made clear that it would aggressively pursue large
scale renewable energy production. It also plans to rid itself from the
dependence on Russian gas supplies. European plans to build a massive

solar power project in the African desert which could potentially
generate power enough for every home in Europe. And now with President
Obama promising to free America from imported oil, OPEC feels that a
major part of its partnership with two key customers has a bleak future
thus prompting it to make such false statements.


The tables seem to have turned now. Last year when the international
crude oil prices blasted all previous records the OPEC members celebrated
the billions of dollars of annual revenues they amassed as a result of
the world’s oil addiction. Now that the world is suffering from an
economic recession, car companies are going bankrupt and airline
companies are cancelling fights, the OPEC is panicking with fear that all
the major economies would invest billions of dollars in developing new
energy systems based on renewable sources while neglecting oil.


The world leaders must understand that renewable energy, and not oil, is
the future. This economic crisis has given us a rare opportunity to kill
two birds in one strike - fire up the economy and get rid of the fossil
fuels. By investing in renewable energy projects we would not only be
ensuring energy security but also creating millions of jobs. The leaders
of the developed world and those of the developing countries like India
and China, must avoid giving such false and illogical statements much
importance and must continue to invest heavily in renewable energy
projects.



http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/04/dont-blame-oil-developed-nations-are-responsible-for-climate-change-says-opec/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2022
May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager