On Mar 17, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
>> do you have thme in a cupboard somewhere?
>
> In a Starlink folder.
>
feel free to mail them to me if there are no electronic versions.
Got the old bulletins yesterday.
Here's issue #1: http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/bulletins/n01.pdf
>> Please turn them to SGPs
>
> Sometime... perhaps. All we have are the tables, unless there are
> residual files of Anne Charles.
>
the tables are better than nothing. htmltolatex.
> Interesting reading and contrasting views in the comments under best/
> worst features.
>
Yes. Lots of "this is great" and "this is terrible" comments for the
same app.
>> I sometimes consider moving SPECDRE and TWODSPEC out of figaro
>> again....
>
> At least TWODSPEC uses Figaro subroutine libraries and had a tagline
> "Some Additions to Figaro". There used to several Figaro-
> compatible packages like NDPROGS, PAMELA, and TAUCAL.
>
> SPECDRE was a proper Starlink package calling NDF (hence separates
> QUALITY and bad values), using an extension, and uses AGI rather
> than some fudge to propagate graphical information. It needs AST.
>
Yes. specdre shouldn't be there at all. It should be moved back out.
--
Tim Jenness
Joint Astronomy Centre
|