Dear David,
What I find strange is those '115tandard' and '114are' things. The
first letter in the condition name is replaced by its ASCII code.
Could it be something you did? It might also be some bug introduced
with the latest SPM8b updates. I'll re-check tomorrow and let you
know.
Best,
Vladimir
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:45 PM, David Ruhl <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello SPM gurus,
> I face a problem when going through the EEG tutorial for spm8b. After
> I've converted, montaged, epoched, downsampled, filtered, and remove
> artifacts from the data (ie, up through 12.8 in the manual), the data
> either does not average correctly or averages right but does not
> display correctly.
>
> When I select the afdeM* file after clicking average, I get the
> following error messages (though the progress bar goes by quickly, the
> gui pops up, and the mafdeM* file is written):
>
> SPM8b: spm_eeg_average (v$Rev: 2715 $) 11:53:15 - 15/03/2009
> ========================================================================
> Warning: afdeMspm8_example.mat: No trials for trial type 115tandard:
> No trials for trial type
>> In spm_eeg_average at 129
> Warning: afdeMspm8_example.mat: No trials for trial type 114are: No
> trials for trial type
>> In spm_eeg_average at 129
> mafdeMspm8_example.mat: Number of replications per contrast:
> average standard: 0 trials, average rare: 0 trials
>
>
> And when I try to look at the trials in the gui I get the following errors:
> ??? Error using ==> axes
> Values must be monotonically increasing.
>
> Error in ==> spm_DisplayTimeSeries at 254
> ud.v.handles.axes = axes('parent',hp,'position',pos1,...
>
> Error in ==> spm_eeg_review_callbacks>updateDisp at 884
> ud = spm_DisplayTimeSeries(D.data.y(:,:,trN(1))',options);
>
> Error in ==> spm_eeg_review_callbacks at 631
> updateDisp(D,1)
>
> ??? Error using ==> spm_eeg_review_callbacks('select','switch')
> Error using ==> axes
> Values must be monotonically increasing.
>
> ??? Error while evaluating uicontrol Callback
>
> The gui tells me there are now 2 trials, each of which is a average of 0 events.
> I've gone through the tutorial up to this point a few time to make
> sure I didn't misread any of the instructions. Any ideas for what's
> wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> David Ruhl
>
|