Bill,
On 13 Mar 2009, at 16:59, Professor Bill Hillier wrote:
> No, to-movement is integration or accessibility (or in maths
> closeness - how easy is it to get to) and through movement is
> choice (or in maths betweeness) or how likely is it to be passed
> through. - Bill
I'm still confused - if movement flows through somewhere are related
to integration (as you mention in Space is the Machine), how does this
differ? Sorry about this, I'm still trying to get my head around how
Space Syntax deals with aspects of co-presence.
Thanks
--
Anzir Boodoo, PhD student
The Institute for Transport Studies, The University of Leeds, LEEDS
LS2 9JT
|