JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  March 2009

MCG March 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: PAS 197:2009

From:

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:36:08 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (199 lines)

Nick,
Just to clarify... you've "sponsored" the process of developing this code of practice but it costs everyone £58 to read it?  Is that right?

Andy
--
Research Programme Director, Eduserv
http://www.eduserv.org.uk/research
http://efoundations.typepad.com
http://twitter.com/andypowe11
+44 (0)1225 474319 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Nick Poole
> Sent: 05 March 2009 15:41
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: PAS 197:2009
> 
> Dear Richard (et al),
> 
> Thanks for the prompt! The BSI release is the first part of 
> an ongoing series of communications activities around this 
> standard, so you're likely to be hearing quite a lot about it 
> in the coming months (and in this email, which is a bit 
> longer than I had originally intended - apologies). 
> 
> To clarify what it is - the full title is 'BSI Publicly 
> Available Specification 197:2009, Code of Practice for 
> Cultural Collections Management'. It is a  joint Code of 
> Practice with the British Standards Institute which the 
> Collections Trust has sponsored (with the support of the 
> Museums, Libraries and  Archives Council) and which has been 
> developed in broad consultation with the sector over the past 
> 18 months with direct input from a Steering Committee of 
> museum, archive and library practitioners.
> 
> The starting proposition for the Code of Practice for 
> Cultural Collections Management is quite simple. After 30 
> years of Collections Management practice, and 10 years of 
> concerted investment, the museums, libraries and archives 
> sector has reached a stage of considerable knowledge and 
> sophistication about the processes and implications of 
> acquiring stuff, caring for it, interpreting it and making it 
> available to the public (the eternal continuum, in the words 
> of the PAS, between collections development, collections 
> information, collections access and collections care). 
> 
> We at the Collections Trust believe that our industry is at 
> the intersection of some very profound shifts - in 
> technology, in consumer behaviour, in our understanding of 
> economic and environmental sustainability and in our 
> behaviours and values about collections and collecting. This 
> tipping point represents both an opportunity and a risk. The 
> opportunity is to define a next generation of professional 
> practice which builds on our collective experience, 
> consolidates it and enables us to move forward with 
> confidence. The risk is that we abandon this knowledge and 
> busily set about reinventing the wheel.
> 
> The 'role' of the standard, then, in the sector is to act as 
> a catalyst. It is to capture the value of decades of 
> professionalisation in Collections Management, to give it a 
> focus and to use it to set the agenda for the next generation 
> of services. 
> 
> Underpinning this are some critical developments in the 
> sector. For one thing, there is no longer such a thing as a 
> 'pure' museum, archive or library.  Instead there are 
> organisations managing an increasingly complex range of 
> content and material and presenting it to an increasingly 
> sophisticated audience in increasingly multi-faceted ways. 
> 
> This is why the entire focus of the work on the Code of 
> Practice has been on creating something that is as 
> 'platform-independent' or inherently cross-domain as 
> possible. In so doing, the Steering Group has created a 
> 'lingua franca' - a common definition of the scope of 
> Collections Management which we believe will work for 
> curators, archivists and librarians (and in the process 
> encourages them to share their knowledge and skills more 
> explicitly). It is, in this sense, a ground-up approach to 
> interoperability as an inherent property of management 
> systems, rather than as a feat of retroactive engineering. 
> The group has also looked out, beyond our sector, into the 
> worlds of logistics, supply-chain, manufacture and knowledge 
> management, to learn from the experiences of others. 
> 
> The point about a common definition is critical - it attempts 
> to resolve the 'either/or' question about how you approach 
> your collections. 'Do I have to use SPECTRUM to manage my 
> archive? Can I use CALM for my object records?'. The answer 
> is that the PAS 197 Code of Practice provides an overarching 
> framework which lets you 'assemble' an approach to managing 
> your collections that is appropriate to your collections and 
> the uses you want to put them to. It means not having to say 
> 'I am *this* kind of organisation, and this alone'.
> 
> The second key development is the reduction in silos between 
> functions and systems across different parts of these 
> institutions. A key aim of this work is to move from a system 
> in which there is a division between front and back-of-house, 
> between education and documentation, towards something much 
> more holistic and better-integrated. The emphasis here is on 
> resolving the division between collections knowledge and 
> other types of information and working towards integrated 
> information systems which allow knowledge to flow freely 
> between different parts of the organisation.  And before you 
> ask - yes, this is how we see the future of SPECTRUM. 
> Ultimately, we believe that Information Management in 
> museums, archives and libraries will be a utility, happening 
> in the cloud, but for now we have to content ourselves with 
> integration and exchange.
> 
> So...to try and reduce all that down to a simple proposition 
> - it is a standard for the next generation of Collections 
> Management practitioners which builds on the knowledge and 
> experience of the current and previous generation. It 
> provides an integrated, holistic and proportionate approach 
> to defining Collections Management practice in your institution.
> 
> It is also, absolutely, emphatically, a starting point for 
> discussion. You'll know that we make a habit of not doing 
> these things unilaterally and we are totally aware that this 
> thing will only fly if you lot want it. Hence the standard 
> was developed with comments from more than 200 of you, and 
> its publication kicks off a 2-year review period. More 
> information about how to contribute to this will be 
> circulated shortly.
> 
> As for the other questions you'll want answers to...Is it 
> part of Accreditation? No, but we hope it will inform the 
> review of the Accreditation Scheme happening in the next 2 
> years. Do I have to buy it? We'll be circulating some 
> information about what's in it and who is likely to need a 
> copy as part of our comms about it. Do I have to do it? 
> Chances are you already are, in some form, but no - it's not 
> an obligation. Does it replace SPECTRUM? Nope, it mainstreams 
> SPECTRUM (and other archive/library infomatics standards) 
> within a broader framework of organisation-wide Information 
> Management which serves the interests both of the collections 
> and their users. 
> 
> OK, so that's an unforgivably long email in reply, but this 
> is arguably the most important piece of work the Collections 
> Trust has been responsible for since the development of 
> Collections Link, and it will inform every part of our work 
> going forward from here. In order to provide a 'place' for 
> responses, I have also posted this reply to the OpenCulture 
> blog at http://openculture.collectionstrustblogs.org.uk. 
> 
> All best, 
> 
> Nick 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
> Behalf Of Richard Light
> Sent: 05 March 2009 13:55
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: PAS 197:2009
> 
> The PAS "Code of practice for cultural collections 
> management" has been published by BSI.  See press release:
> 
> www.bsigroup.com/en/About-BSI/News-Room/BSI-News-Content/Disci
> plines/Sust
> ainability/PAS-197-publication
> (or:
> http://tinyurl.com/d6zndp
> if you have URL-wrapping problems in your mail reader)
> 
> Would Nick care to comment on the role he expects this 
> standard to play in the U.K. MLA sector?
>  
> Richard
> 
> --
> Richard Light
> 
> **************************************************
> For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the 
> list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> **************************************************
> 
> **************************************************
> For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the 
> list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> **************************************************
> 

**************************************************
For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
**************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager