JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  March 2009

GP-UK March 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: QoF

From:

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:15:13 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

I think there are some undeniable results from QOF

1. It is possible to motivate UK GP's to pursue certain coding/recall
targets with surprisingly small financial carrots

2. Pursuit of the incentivised targets (undeniable?) inevitably has an
impact on the unincentivised ones (largely because for most GPs the working
hours are already filled doing other stuff)

3. Despite a promise that all QOF targets would be heavily evidenced, they
have become increasingly politicised (it is too tempting for politicians not
to seek to "manage" GPs, and given that we are on public contracts that is
to some extent reasonable)

4. Increasing achievement scores probably reflect increasing organisational
skills at recall/justifying exemption coding rather than improved clinical
care.

5. QOF is now used as a zero-sum game when it comes to overall GP payment,
much like any "over-perfomance" on the contract resulted in "claw-back".

6. Making the incentive money (which is not the strongest motivator of
clinicians if you read the research, despite widespread belief) IMO leads to
viewing the outcomes in money terms for the practice. E.g. if we can get
from where we are now to perfect hypertension scores that's worth 2000
pounds, but its going to cost us 2500 pounds so its not worth doing

7. Difficult to measure targets are under-represented, with an emphasis on
targets with numbers on

8. Incentivising one part of the team (the partners) with financial reward
for (supposed) clinical outcome measures, can cause resentment for other
team members who do not share the reward (e.g.practice nurses, salaried
assistants, hospital colleagues) and cause cynicism

Some method to measure long term outcome clinical outcomes (wherever
possible not simply the proxy endpoints) is needed. It needs to be over the
full cycle of care, and the fact that is difficult and requires case mix
adjustment is no excuse to not do it because 1) there are disturbing
variations and (e.g. experience at Bristol) 2) we should all want to learn
how to do it better.

QOF is almost certainly not fitting the bill.

-----Original Message-----
From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Balin
Sent: 20 March 2009 08:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: QoF

Discussion rages in Aus about how far to copy the UK. Many pundits
stating categorically that the QoF has been shown to be a failure. [with
no references]

Is there any 'evidence' out there? Yeah, sure there will always be docs
who play the system to patient's detriment, but has there been any sign
of an overall improvement in standards of care? If no, is that because
there is evidence of no improvement, or just lack of robust data?

I ask because I abhor tick-box medicine too. As a GP with an > 90%
immunisation rate pre-1990 Contract, I was dead against the introduction
of cut-off points for payment as I felt that a GP in an inner city area
who might be hard pushed to make the lower 70% grade, would in fact give
up trying, and rates would actually decrease. I was proved to be 100%
wrong in this, much as it pains me to admit that bastard K CLarke was
right..

Now I am hearing similar gut-feeling reactions to 'quality markers'-
just it would be fascinating to know the truth about what has happened
since the latest New Contract [and surely some data must be available
somewhere?]

--

Cheerio,

Graham

PS note the rising inflection at the end of the last sentence - I must be
picking up the Aussie accent!



**********************************************************************
This message  may  contain  confidential  and  privileged information.
If you are not  the intended  recipient please  accept our  apologies.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute  information in this e-mail
or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your co-operation.

NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
**********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager