JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH  March 2009

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH March 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Survey 1.0

From:

William Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

William Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:18:37 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (202 lines)

Barry

Actually it can get more complex than the number of options.  And, you can
get a range of opinions on the number of options.
There are no simple answers.

Certainly 7 options potentially gives you more variability in the response
set.

Also, folks will argue that having an even number of options avoids the
'mean response' problem.
However, technically these scales are not mathematically continuous, they
are actually categorical
although most folks treat them as continuous.  

I agree with Paul, it also depends on the purpose of the survey and the
intended audience.
While it is likely that over a large population responses will regress to
the mean (whatever it is) there are some interesting
response patterns to surveys.
Those with more extreme responses (greater like-dislike, greater love-hate,
etc.) tend to be early responders.  These are
the folks that have the strongest opinions and have already formed an
opinion on the topic.
If this is a one time survey (once out with follow-ups) you will likely get
about 60% of the final response rate
in the first 7-10 days. So if you send out 1,000 surveys and get 60 back,
you are likely to get a total of 100 at the end.
Surveys with low response are targeted to the wrong group and/or don't
address questions of importance to the target group.

The format of each item is critical depending on the purpose of the survey.
 Do you want to really know what
you are doing well and what needs to be improved?  If so, the items should
help you discriminate.  

I would suggest a pilot test or two.  Try different numbers of options and
different item wordings to see
which pattern works best for answering your research question.

Patient satisfaction is a tough area to truly assess. Patients, even in
anonymous surveys, don't want to
'offend' their physicians and may temper their responses.  When I do
patient surveys I always pilot test
the surveys with individuals from  the intended target audience and use an
observed response process where I sit with
the respondent and then after each of their answers probe with them what
the understood the item
to mean and then why they answered the way that they did.  Also, I am
interested in what other
thoughts they have that are triggered by the item.  Sometimes respondents
will say something to the
effect "You asked about A but what is really important to me is B."  That
helps drive the final item 
formation and selection.

All the best with your survey.

Bill

>>> Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]> 3/12/2009 7:44 AM >>>
I tend agree with Anne, that with 4 choices, it forces a decision. Maybe 6
choices would add some more nuance and valuable information for analysis.
But yes, people tend to take the middle ground if given the choice when in a
5 point scale. This is a very interesting question and the debate can make
for interesting feedback. Depends on the survey objectives too. 


 
 
Best,
 
Paul 
 


--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Anne Gill <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From: Anne Gill <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Survey 1.0
To: "Paul Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
Received: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 11:35 AM


Hello All I am not a statistician but I understood if you have an odd
number in a Likert scale e.g. 5 people will tend to favour the middle number
as the neutral option whereas if you have 4 or 6 they are more likely to
make a decision either way which could be important in some instances.
Regards
Anne


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:





Yes, the typical number is 5 with a graded response, the middle most often
'3' on a 1-5 scale. 


 
 
Best,
 
Paul 
 

--- On Thu, 3/12/09, Netuveli, Gopal <g.netuveli@IMPERIAL..AC.UK> wrote:


From: Netuveli, Gopal <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Survey 1.0

To: [log in to unmask] 
Received: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 6:49 AM




Majority of the Likert scale items in satisfaction surveys tend to be five.

 
Gopal Netuveli
PCSM, Imperial Colege London


From: Evidence based health (EBH) [[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Barry Diner [[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 12 March 2009 01:57
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Survey 1.0






Sorry I did not give enough information
 
The survey is patient satisfaction survey looking at specific issue related
to the unique patient population at the Texas Heart Institute.

We want to look at overall satisfaction, expectations and areas of weakness

It will be disseminated online through email 
  
When I asked about scale I meant the number of possible responses 5 or 7 or
more 
  
Thanks 
  
Barry 
  
  
 










Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now! 


-- 
Anne Gill, Senior Lecturer, 
University of Greenwich       
School of Health and Social Care
Room MS218, Southwood Site
Avery Hill Rd
Eltham
London SE9 2UG

Tel: +44 (0)20 8 331 7502 
Fax: +44 (0)20 8 331 9941
email: [log in to unmask] 

If you have a Freedom of Information request, please direct it to: 
[log in to unmask] 

University of Greenwich, a charity and company limited by guarantee, 
registered in England (reg no. 986729).  Registered Office: Old Royal 
Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich SE10 9LS.





      __________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now at
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager