Well, I respect all three, but like the first two much better. Perhaps
coupling the third to the other two is the problem. Let it be itself because
of its difference in narrative mode. It can stand alone.
Andrew
2009/2/24 Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>
> I agree with the last, but am fairly persuaded that all 3 are 'fiction' in
> the sense you mean, Max; and not, in a somewhat different sense...?
>
> Doug
> On 23-Feb-09, at 12:02 AM, Max Richards wrote:
>
> I think I 'get' 1 and 2 and feel the anxiety of the situations,
>> but 3 seems more like 'fiction' and I can't yet situate the speaker in
>> relation
>> to what is told.
>> But all three packed with life and language life as usual, Fred.
>>
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/ <http://www.ualberta.ca/%7Edbarbour/>
>
> Latest books:
> Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
> http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
> Wednesdays'
>
> http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
>
> It's always night or we wouldn't need light.
>
> Thelonious Monk
>
--
Andrew
http://hispirits.blogspot.com/
|