JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GRIDPP-STORAGE Archives


GRIDPP-STORAGE Archives

GRIDPP-STORAGE Archives


GRIDPP-STORAGE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GRIDPP-STORAGE Home

GRIDPP-STORAGE Home

GRIDPP-STORAGE  February 2009

GRIDPP-STORAGE February 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Oxford, ATLAS, DPM, Spacetokens and general brokenness

From:

Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:38:40 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (180 lines)

Hi Ewan,

I assume the space token usage issue still hasn't been solved?

Greig and I just got an email from David Smith which explains
precisely how this stuff works.
Essentially, dpm-listspaces ends up looking at the (memory cached copy
of the) u_space field for each space token in dpm_db.dpm_space_reserv.
This field is supposed to be set equal to the amount of *free* space
available in that token, and is updated both on each file request
starting (to an estimate of the size of the file transferred) and then
on completion of the file transfer (to the actual on-disk value of the
file size).
I think, therefore, that it should be possible to correctly set the
value of u_space by doing:

use cns_db
select sum(f.filesize),r.setname,f.status from Cns_file_metadata as f,
Cns_file_replica as r where f.fileid=r.fileid and r.status!='P' group
by r.setname,f.status;

to get the correct total on-disk size of the files for each space
token (= setname), and then doing some subtraction to arrive at the
value to set each u_space field to.

(You may want to do:
use dpm_db
select sum(requested_size),s_token from dpm_put_filereq where
(status=12288 or status=16384) group by s_token;

to check if there are any incoming /requests/ which are also reserving
space before setting u_space appropriately. If there are requests
which will take a long time to complete, you can include the size of
the returned values in your calculation for the total filesize in
u_space )

Regardless, after updating the value of u_space for the spacetokens,
you will need to restart the dpm daemon to get it to refresh its
in-memory accounting of space used, otherwise it will look like this
hasn't changed at all.

If you're not happy doing this, I can construct a tool which will
appropriately set the field values, in a bit.


I assume that you *have* restarted the dpm daemon since this problem
showed itself, just in case the db is actually correct?

Sam

2009/1/30 Ewan MacMahon <[log in to unmask]>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: GRIDPP2: Deployment and support of SRM and local storage
>> Hi Ewan, (and others)
>>
>> Can you try running this query?
>>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just getting back onto this after a few local distractions; running
> that
> query gives us:
>
> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+
> -----------------+
> | Space Token                          | Token Desc.         | # Files |
> Total Size (GB) |
> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+
> -----------------+
> |                                      | NULL                |   74769 |
> 4704.223786 |
> | NULL                                 | NULL                |      10 |
> 0.000000 |
> | f1171e3a-a112-4069-b6b8-7f54a4a9c3c4 | ATLASDATADISK       |    1797 |
> 504.630595 |
> | adfd9d4a-ac99-4c14-8a43-0365e0d6b1e8 | ATLASGROUPDISK      |       1 |
> 0.000002 |
> | e957b434-b61c-48eb-9aa0-01dc58cd5b97 | ATLASLOCALGROUPDISK |   26139 |
> 784.871504 |
> | 00522908-91fb-4c5b-8816-b036d3b56a3d | ATLASMCDISK         |  296222 |
> 8937.174374 |
> | 574944c4-0ddf-4eb4-b66c-0ffba12a28dc | ATLASPRODDISK       |    3106 |
> 167.958198 |
> | 2be8239e-01e7-4197-9c9a-9e15fa403223 | ATLASUSERDISK       |   25541 |
> 1106.292630 |
> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+---------+
> -----------------+
> 8 rows in set (5.04 sec)
>
> Which I think looks relatively sane (with the possible exception of the
> first row).
> dpm-listspaces, however, shows:
>
> # dpm-listspaces
>
> POOLS:
>
> dpmPart
>    CAPACITY: 130.67T     RESERVED: 47.28T      UNAVAIL (free/used):
> 25.43T/0.00
>                          USED: 8.24T           FREE: 49.71T (38.0%)
>    Space Tokens: ATLASDATADISK, ATLASGROUPDISK, ATLASLOCALGROUPDISK,
>                  ATLASMCDISK, ATLASPRODDISK, ATLASUSERDISK
>    Authorized FQANs: alice, atlas, babar, biomed, calice, camont, cdf,
>                      cedar, cms, dteam, dzero, esr, fusion, geant4,
>                      gridpp, hone, ilc, lhcb, magic, mice, minos,
>                      minos.vo.gridpp.ac.uk, na48, ngs, ngs.ac.uk, ops,
>                      oxg, pheno, planck, sixt,
> supernemo.vo.eu-egee.org,
>                      t2k, vo.southgrid.ac.uk, zeus
>    Space Type: Any                       Retention Policy: Replica
>    Number of file systems : 35           FS selection policy:
> maxfreespace
>
>
> SPACE RESERVATIONS:
>
> ATLASDATADISK   ID=f1171e3a-a112-4069-b6b8-7f54a4a9c3c4
>    CAPACITY: 16.49T      RESERVED: 16.49T      UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 16.49T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas/Role=production
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> ATLASGROUPDISK  ID=adfd9d4a-ac99-4c14-8a43-0365e0d6b1e8
>    CAPACITY: 2.20T       RESERVED: 2.20T       UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 2.20T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas/Role=production
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> ATLASLOCALGROUPDISK     ID=e957b434-b61c-48eb-9aa0-01dc58cd5b97
>    CAPACITY: 6.60T       RESERVED: 6.60T       UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 6.60T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> ATLASMCDISK     ID=00522908-91fb-4c5b-8816-b036d3b56a3d
>    CAPACITY: 17.59T      RESERVED: 17.59T      UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 17.59T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas/Role=production
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> ATLASPRODDISK   ID=574944c4-0ddf-4eb4-b66c-0ffba12a28dc
>    CAPACITY: 2.20T       RESERVED: 2.20T       UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 2.20T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas/Role=production
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> ATLASUSERDISK   ID=2be8239e-01e7-4197-9c9a-9e15fa403223
>    CAPACITY: 2.20T       RESERVED: 2.20T       UNAVAIL (free): 0
>                          USED: 0.00            FREE: 2.20T (100.0%)
>    Space Type: Any       Retention: Replica    Latency: Online
>    Lifetime: Infinite
>    Authorized FQANs: atlas
>    Pool: dpmPart
>
> So it seems to have the correct space token descriptions, the correct
> 'actual' space
> tokens, but not be reporting the usage. Also; if the 'Total Size (GB)'
> column in the
> mysql output is total amount /used/ then is appears to add up to ~16Tb,
> whereas
> dpm-listspaces thinks the total usage is 8.24Tb. The 25Tb shown as
> 'unavailable' is,
> I think, correct - we've got some pools marked as readonly, and their
> free space
> adds to about that amount.
>
> Ewan
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager