Dear All, in particular dear Jesper!
Currently we are working on the registration of 26 subjects. FNIRT did a neat job on 24, but on two of them the slices of the functional data look like long haired hamsters after registration to the standard brain - it's due to extremely warped edges. We used standard settings with 6 and 12 DOFs and results won't get better with more DOFs. I uploaded some files; maybe you could take a quick look (example_func2standard.png included, upload reference number: 809223). However, I must admit FNIRT still does a better job on ventricles than FLIRT does.
Another question related to this topic is: would it be possible to run higher level analysis with different types of registration without difficulties? In this case 24 people with FNIRT and 2 with FLIRT...
Thank you,
Georg
|