On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Peter W. Draper wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Tim Jenness wrote:
>
>> I think the discussion has gone on a bit long but I hope the case for DVCS
>> has now been made. I'd like to proceed with converting the starlink
>> repository to git unless Peter, David and Malcolm have serious reservations
>> or really want to make the case for mercurial. Peter is deepest in a branch
>> at the moment so I imagine he's got the most to gain and the most to lose.
>> Peter, when's a good time?
>
> Any at the moment. I've finished adding the thirdparty support packages, so
> it's just a case of moving the uncommitted changes to GAIA-VO by hand I
> guess. Shouldn't be too onerous.
Tim,
would it be OK to hold off just for a couple of days (I hope) while
I get JNIAST sorted? It's possible that I might need some
tweaks to AST, and I'd rather do this with the existing svn
repository than tangle with git at the same time. But if it looks
like AST business is going to be prolonged (say, beyond the end of
this week), or if you're in a hurry, then then you can go ahead
and I'm sure I can cope.
Mark
--
Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
[log in to unmask] +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
|