On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> fre 2009-01-02 klockan 11:43 -0800 skrev Karen Coyle:
>> I think that this
>> is an area where we will eventually want the library data to abandon
>> the now unnecessary empty node.
>
> Is it unecessary? I was under the impression that it was of some value
> to keep the values together, as they have some form of relationship
> (just as it would be vary lossy to introduce creatorName, creatorAddress
> etc in the Book+Creator example).
At the moment we are defining the vocabulary, not the application
profile or the application design. When we get to those latter two,
then I think some bundling will make more sense. For now, I think our
goal should be to atomize the properties to the extent possible.
Unfortunately, RDA assumes some bundling that I think will make it
hard to be flexible where applications are concerned.
kc
--
-- ---
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
[log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
|