I gather it was our entry on our web site concerning the methadone maintained therapeutic community
residents which kicked of this thread. Any one who wants to see that entry just needs to go to:
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Sorensen_JL_10.txt
We also looked a while ago at the original Dole and Nyswander study which I wanted to reprint so
(Rowdy) everyone could read it but we were denied permission. We did however reconstruct the
original table detailing the sample and outcomes. See our article at:
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Ashton_M_26.pdf
Maybe another thread will be started by one of our newest entries on the site. Here's the title,
description and link:
______________________
Needy clients do as well in day hospital as in residential care
By selecting clients at the very edge of ethically requiring referral to residential care, this US
study confirms that unless there are pressing contraindications, intensive non-residential options
deliver equivalent outcomes. Often of course, there ARE pressing contraindications.
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Witbrodt_J_2.txt
______________________
Regards
Mike
______________________________________________________________
Mike Ashton
DRUG & ALCOHOL FINDINGS
10 Mannock Road
London N22 6AA, England
Tel +44 (0)20 8888 6277 Fax +44 (0)20 8888 6277
Mobile 07759 619571
E-mail [log in to unmask]
http://findings.org.uk
A collaboration between leading UK national drug and alcohol agencies
ALCOHOL CONCERN - DRUGSCOPE - NATIONAL ADDICTION CENTRE
"Linking drug and alcohol research to practice, practice to research."
|