On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> I asked Tim and he thinks that the v2 behaviour should be the same as the
> v1 behaviour (that bit of the code hasn't changed in awhile).
He's right of course, I just checked.
> Are you saying you want just the fundamental region checked?
No, for sure.
> Or infinity??
I guess so. But that could get a bit daft and nasty. It's just a bit
surprising when you check the assignment of say an aliased 3D 15N NOESY
peak and don't see the N resonance for a H that matches, particularly
if you have Intra-residue checked. Makes you worry that Shift Match
Assignments wouldn't find the right assignment (but a. I don't have any
evidence of that & b. that is probably independent code & c. by the time
you're making restraints you should have your min & max ppm sorted out!).
Of course propagate assignments still does it's job correctly etc.
> Tim says the way the code is organised it's a change that
> would go several functions down.
Probably just something to document rather than change (one for the FAQ?).
>> In 2.0.5 I just noticed that the "Unaliased possible" checkbox in the
>> assignment popup honours the spectrum's Minimum & Maximum aliased frequency
>> settings. Is this an intentional change (as far as I remember) from v1
>> behaviour? If so would it be feasible to have an "honour min/max" toggle -
>> for me, the feature is at its most useful before you've set up min & max
>> aliasing fully, but I can see that you might want to restrict it to the
>> min/max later in your analysis of the data.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>
Dr. Brian O. Smith ---------------------- B Smith at bio gla ac uk
Division of Molecular & Cellular Biology,
Faculty of Biomedical & Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459/3089 Fax: 0141 330 4600
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
|