Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 12 Jan 2009 16:03:34 -0000533_WINDOWS-1252 OK, limiting the vote to people whom I think we can assume know what vaguely they're talking about, i.e. Acta Cryst. / J. Appl. Cryst. authors, and using the IUCr search engine we get 553 hits for "structure amplitude" and 256 for "structure factor amplitude" (quite close to the ratio for Google so I don't think it's that far out). I didn't check on the peculiar quirks of the IUCr search engine re punctuation though (believe it or not I have more important things to do!). [...]53_12Jan200916:03:[log in to unmask] |