JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  December 2008

OCC-HEALTH December 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: migration by portfolio " annotation"

From:

Jennifer Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:25:22 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hear! Hear!  The 'old ways' now outdated worked so well!!









2 orchid <[log in to unmask]>@JISCMAIL.AC.UK on 23/12/2008 08:53:24



Please respond to Occupational Health mailing list

       <[log in to unmask]>



Sent by:    [log in to unmask]





To:         [log in to unmask]

cc:

Fax to:

Subject:    Re: [OCC-HEALTH] migration by portfolio " annotation"



I agree...



Whilst I realise the importance to our profession  to have appropriately

trained staff giving good advise... is a part 3  registration really the be

all and end all to achieve this....I am old enough to  remember when the

academics took over the asylum in general nursing...and look  at health

care standards now and the numbers leaving nursing??







----- Original Message -----

From:  Lindsey Hall

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:39  PM

Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] migration by  portfolio " annotation"



Diane   and others







This  may sound pompous and opinionated and comes from someone who did

their OHNC in  1990 and is  definitely not on the third part of the

register.  I  have though (so I’m told ) made a reasonable job of employing

lots of people  in the last 10 years or so on both an employed and

subcontract basis and I  couldn’t care less whether a prospective employee

is on the third part of the  register or not and however it might be

annotated.  A couple of the best  people I took on didn’t even have an OH

qualification (they subsequently did  the course and became more qualified

than me).  I have also employed OTs  and physios into OH/case management

roles. I look for a good CV, a good  background and working experience and

a good performance at interview.







Where  I may well catch myself out one day is that the requirement to be on

the third  part of the register seems to be becoming the norm in some

areas.  One of  the large providers currently has this as a criteria for

recruitment into a  team of subcontract OHAs for carrying out work station

assessments.  So  in answer to one of your questions it is probably

starting to make a  difference.  The subsequent question is whether it

should.    Faced with the decision to employ you not on the third part or

someone with  less than your experience who is, I know what my decision is

likely to be.







A  further question – and one to set the cat scampering with even sharper

claws  - is whether any of this should be relevant at all. In a world of

multidisciplinary OH where we have physios, OTs, Vocational rehab

consultants  etc, shouldn’t we be thinking about an independent Institute

of Occupational  Health and Welfare to govern our collective practice and

questioning whether  we should still be looking to the NMC for this at

all.







A  Happy Christmas and New Year to all.







Lindsey











From:[log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf

Of  Diane Romano-Woodward

Sent: 22 December 2008 19:01

To:  [log in to unmask]

Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] migration by  portfolio " annotation"







Hello  list,



This may put the cat among the  pigeons....



I have sucessfully submitted a portfolio and I  am at the stage where my

name is to be put on the third part of the register.  The NMC has asked me

if I want it "annotated" that is, after SCPHN put "  OH ".



I am of two minds on this . One is it will indicate that I  practice and

have expertise in OH. But then again anyone who need to know that  ,(eg

prospective employers )  would  have a look at my CV and figure  that out

fairly quickly.



Alternatively should I emphasise that I  have satisifeid the NMC that I can

practices as a Public Health Nurse  (omitting the OH), which seems to be

the way that the world is drifting.



Does it make any difference at all?



Many OH jobs  require that you are on the third part of the register, which

I will be,  whatever I chose. Some ask for a qualification in OH which I

have, although  not one recognised by the NMC.



Anyone got any strong views?  Particularly those who might want to employ

me in the future   :)





Cheers

Diane  Romano-Woodward







Take your friends  with you with Mobile Messenger. Click Here!



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before replying.



OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html



CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH



OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS http://OHJobs.drmaze.net



OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION http://www.aohne.org.uk

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before  replying.



OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html



CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:

http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH



OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS http://OHJobs.drmaze.net



OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION http://www.aohne.org.uk







No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG -  http://www.avg.com

Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1861 -  Release Date:

22/12/2008 11:23



*****************************************************************************

This message was received by the Magnox South Sites Internet Email Gateway

and was checked for Viruses and SPAM by the MessageLabs Email Management

Service.

Please forward any suspicious or unwanted emails to "Spam Helpdesk"

*****************************************************************************







The information contained in this email may be commercially sensitive and/or legally privileged. If you have received this message in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. You must not disclose it to any other person, copy or distribute it or use it for any purpose.

Views expressed in this email are not necessarily those of Magnox South Limited.

Magnox South Limited is a company registered in England under Company number 6005213, owned by Energy Solutions, Inc. Registered Office: Berkeley Centre, Berkeley, Gloucestershire GL13 9PB.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager