Yep, it's a registered vocabulary:
http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/vocabulary_id/31.html
Yum, yum, that dogfood is tasty!
:-)
Diane
Karen Coyle wrote:
> Of course. But do you know where I might find the status codes?
>
> kc
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Diane I. Hillmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to have Jon look at this before we try any fiddling, but he's on
>> grand jury duty this week so it might take a bit of time before he can get
>> to it.
>>
>> Diane
>>
>> Karen Coyle wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> 3. rda:placeOfPublication is required in scenario 4 but is marked as
>>>>> deprecated in the RDA elements schema.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The difficulty is that it is in there twice - once deprecated and once
>>>> not. They have the same URI. So there's something wrong with the way
>>>> to registry is handling these, hopefully something that can be fixed.
>>>> It seems that no two entries should have the same URI.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I tried retrieving placeOfPublication but I only get one record in
>>> response (if I am understanding it correctly). It has a status of
>>> "RegStatus/1002". Is there a document that explains the status codes?
>>> I looked at the wiki but nothing jumped out at me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> kc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
|