Hi Mikael,
> Could you consider importing the term definitions into the
> IEEE template? Just use the attached file.
I'm just working through doing that now....
One quick question: in
http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce/LomDCAMAnalysi
s
the mappping for 2.1 Version indicated a requirement for a class
lom:Version (which would be the range of the lom:version property), and
that's how that property is described currently in
http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce/LomTerms
In the new PDF version, the mapping (correctly, I think) uses a
LangString.
So I think that means the range of the lom:version property should be
lom:LangString and we don't need the lom:Version class?
Is that right please?
Alternatively, I guess we _could_ still have a resource of type
lom:Version as the value, with the same value strings, but that would
seem slightly inconsistent with other cases like
lom:installationRemarks, lom:otherPlatformRequirements.
Thanks
Pete
|