> > Also, I'm confused by the entry in the LOM Terms wiki [2] 
> for that element:
> > 
> > Property URI: 	 http://ltsc.ieee.org/rdf/lom#taxonSource
> > Qualified Name: 	lom:taxonSource
> > Defined By: 	LOM Terms http://ltsc.ieee.org/rdf/lom#
> > Type of Term: 	rdf:Property
> > Domain: 	lom:LangString
> > Range: 	rdfs:Literal
> > 
> > Why is the domain lom:LangString? -- I was expecting 
> lom:TaxonPath. And for range I'd expect lom:LangString.
> 
> Most likely a copy-paste error, thanks again!

Oops, my mistake. Fixed.

http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce/LomTerms

Irwin's message reminds me that I wondered about the use of the
lom:keyword property in two different contexts.

i.e. i.e. for 1.5 General.Keyword the relationship is between the
Learning Object and the keyword-as-LangString, and for 9.4
Classification.Keyword the relationship is between a "Classification"
and the keyword-as-LangString. 

I suppose it all depends on what relationship we are indicating using
the property.

For 1.5, the LOM standard says the keyword is "A keyword or phrase
describing the topic of this learning object"

But for 9.4, where we model the "Classification" as a distinct resource,
is that the same relationship? I'm not sure. It seems maybe closer to a
"name" or "label" in this case?

Pete
---
Pete Johnston
Technical Researcher, Eduserv Foundation
[log in to unmask] 
+44 (0)1225 474323
http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/
http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/