tor 2008-12-04 klockan 10:25 +1100 skrev Flack, Irvin:
> Mikael
> 
> Thank you for the work you and others have done on this. The
> complexity of the whole exercise is pretty mindboggling to me.

Yes. describing these mappings formally is a lot of work. On the other
hand, one we get a few simple examples out of the door, it will be much
more accessible.

> 
> I've only been able to read through the document [1] quickly so far
> but I have a query about 9.2.1:Source. I thought I was following the
> logic of the DC-Text representation but I hit a problem with this
> element.
> 
> You have:
> 
> Description (
>  ResourceId ( TXP )
>  Statement (
>   PropertyURI ( lom:taxonSource )
>   LiteralValueString ( “Value” )
>  )
> )
> 
> The 9.2.1:Source element in LOM has the datatype 'LangString' whereas
> your mapping indicates it as a LiteralValueString (what I understand
> as corresponding to the LOM datatype 'CharString'). Is that a mistake
> or a deliberate decision on your part - or am I misunderstanding
> something?
> 

A mistake, indeed. Thanks for the catch.

> Also, I'm confused by the entry in the LOM Terms wiki [2] for that element:
> 
> Property URI: 	 http://ltsc.ieee.org/rdf/lom#taxonSource
> Qualified Name: 	lom:taxonSource
> Defined By: 	LOM Terms http://ltsc.ieee.org/rdf/lom#
> Type of Term: 	rdf:Property
> Domain: 	lom:LangString
> Range: 	rdfs:Literal
> 
> Why is the domain lom:LangString? -- I was expecting lom:TaxonPath. And for range I'd expect lom:LangString.

Most likely a copy-paste error, thanks again!

/Mikael

-- 
<[log in to unmask]>

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose