Please - not 'Death and Furniture' again... But, if you must, anyone
tempted to read it probably also needs to read the following to make
proper sense of the debate:
Hibberd, F. (2001). Relativism versus realism: all-but a specious
dichotomy. History of the Human Sciences, 14(3), 102-107.
McLennan, G. (2001). "Thus": reflections on Loughborough relativism.
History of the Human Sciences, 14(3), 85-101.
Parker, I. (1999a). Against relativism in psychology, on balance.
History of the Human Sciences, 12(4), 61-78.
Parker, I. (1999b). The quintessentially academic position. History of
the Human Sciences, 12(4), 89-91.
Potter, J., Edwards, D., & Ashmore, M. (1999). Regulating criticism:
some comments on an argumentative complex. History of the Human
Sciences, 12(4), 79-88.
Does this exemplify my earlier point about the proliferation of ideality
and relatively unimportant argument that postmodernism seems to encourage?
Its also worth making clear that not all those who are critical of
postmodernism, either as a totality or in part, are Marxists on the one
hand or reactionaries on the other.
J.
Jeffrey, Grant wrote:
> Hiya Keith,
>
> I enjoyed the quote you sent us! But I was not shocked.....
>
> A key question to the author might be "Who arbitrates on what actually counts as 'progress'?" I am also quite worried about how we can be sure history is marching 'forward'? History is more likely lost in a gloomy forest.
>
> 'Post-modernism' is not 'unpopular', that is so not fair of Mclure! It isn't competing in a philosophical 'X' Factor! Is Marxism the 'Take That' of philosophy to 'Post-modernism's' Chas and Dave? :-)
>
> I think PM is a very loose ragbag of ideas that is still unfolding. 'Post-modern' thinkers often don't agree with one another and there are many post-modernisms.... it can't be easy to be against it all but I know people try ;-)
>
> Mostly I just want to say I agree with David's posting and am in general agreement with much of the quotation. The list of qualities of post-modernism given, "fragmentation, ambiguity, loss of certainty" etc, reads like a list of my personal values.
>
> It seems to me that people neglect the radical action element of a lot of post-modern thinking. Foucault and Deleuze were very politically active on a range of fronts and I would definitely recommend investigating the political expression of the ideas in order to see how the philosophical thinking is 'useful' and 'pragmatic'. Foucault is very sharp when writing about living a 'non-fascist life', his strong emphasis on 'de-individualizing' seems especially relevant to community psychologists, as does his injunction:
>
> "Do not think one has to be sad in order to be militant, even though the thing one is fighting is abominable."
>
> Post-modern writer's emphasis on difference over uniformity, and mobile arrangements over systems, provides rich resources for thinking about communities in non-hierarchical non-authoritarian ways.
>
> There is something rather desperate and paranoid about some of the Trotskyist attacks on PM thinking, and Alex Callinicos' "Against Postmodernism" struck me as a deeply reactionary rant - but is a good read if you want to size up some of the anti-pm arguments). I don't think the Marxists and the Post-Modernists need to go to war with one another, but don't want to go as far as Fred Newman who writes (in Against and For CBT p 220) (I am)..."an orthodox Marxist - turned - post-modern Marxist"? Anyone on the barricades with the Post-Modern Marxist Party?
>
> There is an interesting paper in History of the Human Sciences Vol 8 No 2 1995 by Edwards, Ashmore and Potter called 'Death and Furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism' which is an entertaining read, even if it doesn't convince you it might make you smile.
>
> Yours, an indecisive relativist, Grant
>
> ("Looking away shall be my only form of negation" FN)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Fryer
> Sent: 12 December 2008 08:07
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] Post Modernism doesn't believe in progress
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> If by 'critique' you mean 'comprehensive criticism', I would not be interested in offering that because (although there are issues in the quote which I would problematise and although I appreciate that within dominant frames of reference some of the points in the quote may be hard to accept and easy to ridicule), I am in general agreement with much of (how I read) the quotation and think community (and other) psychologies informed by such ideas less problematic than the currently 'modernist' dominant ones.
>
> If by 'critique' you mean 'processing from a critical frame of reference' (processing which would bring to the surface ideological implications including ones which are progressive), I would be in interested in participating part in that except that it would take some time to do adequately and I am struggling to find time for existing commitments at the moment. However the book which you talked about buying (Denzin and Lincoln 3rd Ed.) has many contributions which draw positively on 'post modern' scholarship and I think reading those will illustrate this point.
>
> David
>
> ________________________________________
> From: The UK Community Psychology Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Venables,Keith (Children and Younger Adults) [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 11 December 2008 19:32
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [COMMUNITYPSYCHUK] Post Modernism doesn't believe in progress
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I was shocked to read this from MacLure (1995) on the Impact of
> Postmodernism :
>
> As a starting point: think fragmentation, ambiguity, loss of certainty.
> Think of postmodernism as a kind of undoing of all the habits of mind of
> so-called western thought that have prevailed over the last two
> centuries - the decidability of truth, the inevitability of progress,
> the triumph of reason, the possibility of a universal modern code, the
> objectivity of science, the forward march of history, the existence of
> the singular, autonomous self. These foundational principles, are all to
> do with making the world knowable, accountable, unambiguous,
> generalisable, predictable, coherent, manageable and mutually
> comprehensible. They have all, at one time or another, been held to be
> characteristic of modernism. And post-modernism says 'No' to them. You
> will begin to understand its widespread unpopularity.
>
> MacLure, M. (1995) Postmodernism: a post script, Educational Action
> Research, 6 (3) 453-469
>
> Is there anyone out there who might offer me a critique of this
> postmodernism?
>
> Keith Venables
>
>
> ******************************************************************************
> Think before you print! Save energy and paper.
> Do you really need to print this email?
> Derbyshire County Council is one of the best councils in the country. With the audit commission's top 'Four Star' rating we work to improve the lives of local people by delivering high quality services.
>
> You can find out more about us by visiting 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk'. If you want to work for us go to our job pages on 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk/jobs'. You can register for e-mail alerts, download job packs and apply on-line.
>
> ******************************************************************************
> Please Note:
>
> This email is confidential, may be legally privileged and may contain personal views that are not the views of Derbyshire County Council. It is intended solely for the addressee. If this email was sent to you in error please notify us by replying to the email. Once you have done this please delete the email and do not disclose, copy, distribute, or rely on it.
>
> Under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 the contents of this email may be disclosed.
>
> Derbyshire County Council reserves the right to monitor both sent and received emails.
>
> ******************************************************************************
> ___________________________________
> COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
> To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK
> For any problems or queries, contact the list moderators: Rebekah Pratt ([log in to unmask]) or Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])
--
********************************************************
John Cromby
Department of Human Sciences
Loughborough University
Loughborough, Leics
LE11 3TU England
Tel: 01509 223000
Email: [log in to unmask]
Personal webpage: http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~hujc4/
Co-Editor, "Subjectivity": www.palgrave-journals.com/sub
********************************************************
___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=COMMUNITYPSYCHUK
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderators: Rebekah Pratt ([log in to unmask]) or Grant Jeffrey ([log in to unmask])
|