Dear Michelle & SPMers -
you might have solved the problem by now, but as another suggestion: The
best workaround I've found for this 'cone head' problem is to use
segmentation (SPM5!) instead of normalization to estimate the *_sn.mat, and
then apply these parameters to all functionals + the structural via
normalize:write. In my case, this produced much better results than both
using a brain mask, and using linear transformations only!
best,
Maria
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:34:39 +0000, Michelle Welman
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>Dear all,
>
>thank you for all your advices. i am going to try them
>
>greets, michelle
>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:42:01 +0000
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [SPM] wrong normalize
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:34:26 +0000, Michelle Welman
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dear,
>> >
>> >As you can see in my attachment the normalisation goes completely wrong,
>> does anybody kow what I did wrong and how I should do it correctly?
>>
>> I've seen normalizations like that before. My recollection is that it
might be
>> due to not using a brain mask.
>>
>> >
>> >Kind regards,
>> >
>> >Michelle Welman
>> >
>> >_________________________________________________________________
>> >Zoek en win prachtige prijzen met Lucky Search!
>> >http://www.luckysearch.nl/
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Weet jij het beter? Geef je mening over de taal in Windows Live-producten!
>http://www.microsoft.com/language/MTCF/mtcf_home.aspx?langid=1455&cult=nl-nl
-----------------------------------------------
Maria Wimber
Department of Neurology II
Otto-von-Guericke University
39110 Magdeburg
office: Zenit I/ Room 283
phone: +49 (0)391 61 17 543
mailto: [log in to unmask]
|