JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NURSE-PHILOSOPHY Archives


NURSE-PHILOSOPHY Archives

NURSE-PHILOSOPHY Archives


NURSE-PHILOSOPHY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NURSE-PHILOSOPHY Home

NURSE-PHILOSOPHY Home

NURSE-PHILOSOPHY  November 2008

NURSE-PHILOSOPHY November 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: dignity -- say what?

From:

Olga Jarrin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Olga Jarrin <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:06:12 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (730 lines)

Thank you Savina, I look forward to reading the article. Olga
  
Gadow, S. (1983). Basis for nursing ethics: paternalism, consumerism, or advocacy. Hospital Progess, 64(10), 62-67,78.

--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Savina Schoenhofer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Savina Schoenhofer <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 9:57 AM
> Olga,  what you have said calls to mind the classic paper by
> Sally Gadow on 
> three models of relationship common (at that time...and
> maybe still?) to 
> nursing: paternalism, consumerism, and advocacy.  Sorry I
> can't call up the 
> specific citation...but perhaps now is the time for this
> work to be brought 
> forward in prominence for consideration by our novice
> nursing scholars.
> 
> Savina Schoenhofer
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Olga Jarrin" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:21 AM
> Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> 
> 
> Doane & Varcoe's (2008) article I mentioned
> "how the discipline has 
> inadvertently adopted epistemologies that are contrary to
> nursing values and 
> goals" and goes on to note "there has been little
> exploration into 
> embodiment/disembodiment and the living relation of
> epistemology and 
> ontology (p. 289)."
> 
> I so glad Barb mentioned she works in an institution that
> uses Watson's 
> Caring Science to guide nursing practice. The integration
> of caring 
> standards might help to clarify the focus of nursing care
> in the larger 
> context of overall care which is shared with biomedical
> oriented providers 
> with biomedical outcome goals.
> 
> Nerissa's alma mater has in their philosophy statement
> that: "Nursing is the 
> art and science of caring. The focus of nursing is to
> provide a caring 
> presence and to create an environment that facilitates
> healing of persons, 
> families, groups, and communities. Caring, as the essence
> and central focus 
> of nursing, is what makes persons, their environments and
> interpersonal 
> concerns meaningful. Caring in action consists of
> philosophical, 
> interpersonal, and technical components that interface to
> facilitate caring 
> interactions and caring environments. Professional nurse
> caring combines 
> cognitively and culturally learned behaviors, actions, and
> techniques that 
> enable the creation of healthy, healing environments for
> nurses, clients, 
> and colleagues. The ethics of care and responsibility
> involves moral agency, 
> interdependence, and professional integrity."
> 
> My work is centered on the idea that nursing is situated
> caring shaped by 
> interior and exterior environments. Interior environments
> referring to 
> concepts like mental attitude; personal philosophical of
> nursing, 
> ethical/moral & cultural orientation... while exterior
> environments include 
> educational training, work setting, systems issues,
> human/material 
> resources, etc. How we define caring and what it means to
> be a caring nurse 
> is shaped by all these dimensions and can change over time.
> Grounding in 
> paternalistic, biomedical education seems like it would be
> extremely 
> influential in one's conceptualization of caring as a
> second career nurse.
> 
> I notice my inbox filling with other's response and
> will stop here for now 
> and add this to the mix.
> 
> Olga Jarrin, RN, MS, PhD Candidate
> University of Connecticut
> School of Nursing
> 
> --- On Wed, 11/19/08, Barb Gingher
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Barb Gingher <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 4:42 AM
> > The electronic medical record has gotten the nursing
> staff
> > in our organization back to tthe bedside and patient
> care.
> > As Jean Watson is our theorist of choice, we now have
> caring
> > standards incorporated into the EMR. Many of our
> patients
> > have researched their disease process and are making
> > intelligent decisions in regard to their own
> healthcare.
> > Those who are not as savy can be educated in a
> supportive
> > way and if we cannot change the direction, so be it,
> > however we are no longer "tied" to the
> chart. A
> > simple statement of understanding and feedback from
> patients
> > satisfies documentation needs.
> >
> > Barb, RN, MA, MS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "The past is our definition. We may strive, with
> good
> > reason, to escape it, or to escape what is bad in it,
> but we
> > will escape it only by adding something better to
> it.”
> >
> > Barb Gingher
> >
> > --- On Wed, 11/19/08, Nerissa Belcher
> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Nerissa Belcher <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Fw: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 4:31 AM
> >
> > Once again I assumed the default setting for this
> group was
> > "reply to
> > all" so I accidentally sent my reply to an
> individual.
> > That message is
> > being forwarded to the group.
> >
> >
> > Nerissa
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 11/19/08, Nerissa Belcher
> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Nerissa Belcher
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > > To: "Chris Hanks"
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 4:10 AM
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > It appears my position has been mis-interpreted.
> What
> > > I'm trying to say is we need to provide
> quality
> > medical
> > > care while respecting our patients. As for
> protecting
> > > ourselves with documentation if only it were not
> > necessary.
> > > In the USA, however, nursing is much more about
> > > documentation than patient care. I'm a new
> nurse
> > but was
> > > a podiatrist for twenty years. The same rules
> applied
> > to me
> > > as a foot doctor. Documentation requirements in
> the
> > USA (UK
> > > too?) are out of control. But, like it or not if
> we
> > wish to
> > > retain our employment we do what we're paid
> to do.
> > Which
> > > is to document. A major reason I got out of
> podiatry
> > is I
> > > wasn't paid to document. Each and every
> ridiculous
> > new
> > > documentation requirement to come down the pike
> did
> > not come
> > > with any funding for it. As advantage of nursing
> is as
> > > ridiculous as the requirements are if someone
> wants to
> > pay
> > > me good money to write for the 10,000th time my
> > nursing
> > > focus about pain control and preventing falls
> (hint to
> > the
> > >  administrators - I got the ideas well before
> writing
> > them
> > > down for the 100th time) then so be it. I can
> cash my
> > checks
> > > in good faith.
> > >
> > > Getting back to patient care the ethical issue is
> when
> > > quality care conflicts with patient desires. I
> > disagree with
> > > Stephen Padgett who seems to think that since
> medical
> > > standards change over time we should assume
> patients
> > are as
> > > likely to be accurate in their medical
> assessments as
> > nurses
> > > and other trained medical professionals. Fact is
> the
> > > patients are likely to know less about what works
> than
> > we
> > > do. If they decide not to follow our advice then
> we
> > should
> > > support them in doing so but not put our jobs at
> risk
> > by
> > > failing to document the discussion.
> > >
> > > Additionally I wish to point out that patients
> will
> > more
> > > likely follow our advice if we show confidence in
> > ourselves.
> > > I.E. if we really believe we don't have a
> clue,
> > since
> > > things are always changing, patients will be
> prone to
> > not
> > > following our advice. IMO part of being a
> professional
> > is in
> > > keeping up with our studies so our advice is as
> > current as
> > > research allows.
> > >
> > > Nerissa
> > >
> > > --- On Wed, 11/19/08, Chris Hanks
> > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Chris Hanks
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 3:26 AM
> > > > Dear all
> > > > Thank you Olga for the reference, I will
> read
> > this.
> > > > I have to say that I fully agree with
> > Stephen's
> > > > eloquent outburst.  And there is no reason
> not to
> > be
> > > > passionate in decrying a situation which is
> > commonly
> > > > encountered (though there are delightful
> > exceptions).
> > > > As I read Stephen's contribution I did
> feel
> > for
> > > > Nerissa, as I think that I recognise the
> anxiety
> > of
> > > the new
> > > > nurse placed in a stressful environment,
> however,
> > I
> > > feel it
> > > > crucial that the points Stephen makes are
> carried
> > into
> > > > practice.  I have been having discussions
> with
> > senior
> > > > undergraduate student nurses regarding these
> > ethical
> > > issues
> > > > for many years; the students express
> positive
> > patient
> > > > centred ideals.  When I visit practice areas
> or
> > teach
> > > some
> > > > post qualifying classes, it saddens me that
> often
> > the
> > > ideals
> > > > appear lost.  In particular it worries me
> how
> > often
> > > nurses
> > > > think that they know best, sometimes blessed
> with
> > only
> > > > scanty second hand knowledge, and no
> inclination
> > to
> > > > question.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Stephen
> > > >
> > > > From Chris Hanks
> > > > Senior Lecturer
> > > > University of Plymouth
> > > > England
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > From: A list to promote discussion of
> > philosophical
> > > issues
> > > > in nursing [[log in to unmask]]
> On
> > Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > Olga Jarrin [[log in to unmask]]
> > > > Sent: 19 November 2008 01:31
> > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > > >
> > > > Medical facisim, lol... and after days of
> > dialogue on
> > > how
> > > > we ought to disagree and present our
> arguments!
> > > Stephen,
> > > > Nerissa is an ex-podiatrist and new nursing
> grad
> > (oh
> > > the
> > > > wonders of google). I'm going to take a
> > different
> > > tack
> > > > and reference the latest issue of ANS 31(4),
> > 283-295.
> > > > Gweneth Hartrick Doane & Colleen
> Varcoe's
> > > article
> > > > Knowledge Translation in Everyday Nursing:
> From
> > > > evidence-based to inquiry-based practice
> > addresses
> > > their
> > > > "deeply felt concern with the profound
> > disparity
> > > that
> > > > often exists between what nurses know and
> what
> > nurses
> > > > do." They go on to give an example of a
> > nurse who
> > > > provided care to one of the authors in a way
> > > inconsistent
> > > > with her education. The authors wonder
> briefly if
> > > workplace
> > > > stress or culture might explain the
> incongruence
> > > between the
> > > > nurse's perception of her nursing
> practice
> > and the
> > > > author's perception of her nursing care.
> > > >
> > > > Here is another side of Nerissa, something
> she
> > wrote
> > > just a
> > > > year ago:
> > > >
> > > > I'm in nursing school with one semester
> to
> > go.
> > > Student
> > > > nurses are taught to be supportive of all
> their
> > > patients.
> > > > This includes Christians, atheists,
> minorities,
> > gays,
> > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > I agree strongly with this approach. Nurses
> > should
> > > provide
> > > > the best care they can and not attempt to
> impose
> > their
> > > > opinions on the people they care for.
> > > >
> > > > Nerissa Belcher
> > > > September 23, 2007
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Tue, 11/18/08, Stephen Padgett
> > > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Stephen Padgett
> > > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: dignity -- say what?
> > > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 7:20
> PM
> > > > > I don't know where to begin to say
> how
> > much
> > > this
> > > > message
> > > > > disturbs
> > > > > me. The astonishing arrogance and
> > self-regard of
> > > it is
> > > > > matched only by the
> > > > > wild self-pity. Oh, poor us! Forced to
> do
> > more
> > > > > documentation, to protect
> > > > > ourselves from vengeful patients who
> had the
> > > temerity
> > > > - the
> > > > > cheek!-- to
> > > > > refuse our always-excellent advice! But
> now
> > they
> > > > regret it,
> > > > > don't they?
> > > > > they wish they'd listened to us,
> > they'll
> > > try
> > > > to
> > > > > "re-invent themselves"
> > > > > (whatever that means) to blame us for
> their
> > > lapses,
> > > > but we
> > > > > know better,
> > > > > don't we? don't we always?!
> > > > >
> > > > >       and that this should arrive in my
> > inbox
> > > under
> > > > the subject
> > > > > heading
> > > > > "dignity"!!
> > > > >
> > > > >       No, Nerissa, this isn't
> dignity or
> > > respect
> > > > or even
> > > > > nursing in my
> > > > > book. This is medical fascism. First
> off, it
> > > > conveniently
> > > > > ignores all
> > > > > the mistakes *we* make, all the ways
> our
> > > > "advice"
> > > > > changes with the
> > > > > latest research, the shifting fashions
> and
> > > priorities,
> > > > the
> > > > > season. It
> > > > > ignores all the nonsense we say to
> people...
> > > > >
> > > > >       Have you been a patient recently,
> > Nerissa?
> > > Or a
> > > > family
> > > > > member of
> > > > > one? I don't wish you any ill
> health,
> > but it
> > > is an
> > > > > excellent way to shake
> > > > > off professional arrogance. To be the
> > recipient,
> > > as
> > > > opposed
> > > > > to the
> > > > > dispenser, of so much well-intentioned
> and
> > > utterly
> > > > useless
> > > > > (if not
> > > > > downright offensive) advice that
> nurses,
> > doctors,
> > > and
> > > > > others dish out
> > > > > everyday is a profoundly humbling
> > experience. And
> > > have
> > > > you
> > > > > looked
> > > > > recently at the data on patient
> lawsuits
> > &
> > > > malpractice
> > > > > claims?  Most
> > > > > clinicians wildly over-estimate their
> actual
> > risk
> > > of
> > > > being
> > > > > sued.
> > > > >
> > > > >       And that's not even the main
> > issue. The
> > > main
> > > > issue is
> > > > > simply that
> > > > > people do not give up their rights to
> make
> > > choices
> > > > when
> > > > > they come into the
> > > > > healthcare system. It's astonishing
> to
> > me
> > > that we
> > > > > continue to have
> > > > > to debate this in health care. And no,
> > Nerissa,
> > > > you're
> > > > > not the only one
> > > > > who thinks like this -- this attitude
> is all
> > too
> > > > common
> > > > > among the
> > > > > providers I meet. Not everyone, not by
> a
> > long
> > > shot,
> > > > but far
> > > > > too many. It's
> > > > > the seamy side of professionalism - the
> > "we
> > > know
> > > > > better" side.
> > > > >
> > > > >       Whether you agree with a
> patient's
> > > choices -
> > > > whether
> > > > > you think
> > > > > they make the most sense from a medical
> > > standpoint,
> > > > whether
> > > > > they are
> > > > > congruent with YOUR careplan -- is not
> the
> > point.
> > > The
> > > > point
> > > > > is, it's
> > > > > their call. This ethical orientation is
> > > fundamental to
> > > > our
> > > > > system of
> > > > > professional relationships -- it helps
> to
> > counter
> > > that
> > > > > "we know better"
> > > > > pull - and it is very disheartening to
> hear
> > you
> > > wave
> > > > that
> > > > > away because
> > > > > people making the *wrong* choices might
> > become
> > > > > "problems" later on -
> > > > > problems for us, of course. (Poor us!)
> > > > >
> > > > >       "Warning" people is
> fine,
> > > documenting
> > > > is always
> > > > > a good idea, but I
> > > > > think you need to do more than just
> > "consult
> > > with
> > > > the
> > > > > ethics people." I
> > > > > think you need to have a long talk with
> them
> > > about
> > > > what
> > > > > you're in charge
> > > > > of and what you're not.
> > > > >
> > > > >       Stephen Padgett
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Nerissa Belcher
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ms. Davis,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IMO, if a patient deliberately
> chooses
> > to
> > > > increase
> > > > > their risk despite
> > > > > > nurses advising them of the danger
> then
> > they
> > > are
> > > > > problems waiting to
> > > > > > happen. We all know the drill. The
> > > > > nurse/doctor/therapist, etc. didn't
> > > > > > warn them firmly enough, or
> document
> > well
> > > enough,
> > > > or
> > > > > consult the ethics
> > > > > > people. I support free choice but
> we
> > need to
> > > be
> > > > very
> > > > > aware that people
> > > > > > reinvent their pasts to claim
> ignorance
> > of
> > > things
> > > > > later. Sadly, still
> > > > > > more documentation for nurses
> needs to
> > be
> > > > completed in
> > > > > anticipation of
> > > > > > problems.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nerissa
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- On Tue, 11/18/08, Davis, Betty
> > > > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> From: Davis, Betty
> > > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > >> Subject: RE: dignity
> > > > > >> To: "Nerissa
> Belcher"
> > > > > <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, November 18,
> 2008,
> > 3:10
> > > PM
> > > > > >> You stated, "Show them
> respect
> > > unless
> > > > doing
> > > > > so harms
> > > > > >> their medical
> > > > > >> care."  Does that imply
> that
> > > > noncompliance or
> > > > > >> disagreement with the plan
> > > > > >> of care warrants disrespect? 
> That
> > > statement
> > > > seems
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> disallow free
> > > > > >> choice....  And, please, be
> > gentle....
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Betty W. Davis, PhD, RN, CNE
> > > > > >> Assistant Dean, Nursing
> > > > > >> Program Head, Associate Degree
> > Nursing
> > > > > >> Meridian Community College
> > > > > >> 910 Hwy. 19 North
> > > > > >> Meridian, MS 39307
> > > > > >
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.7/1799 - Release
> Date: 11/19/2008 
> 8:58 AM

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
April 2023
November 2022
October 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
August 2021
May 2020
February 2020
January 2020
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
November 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
May 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
September 2012
July 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager