Dear All,
Whilst this is not strictly mining history, it is in the sense that it is in
the past, and furthermore it is a record of what has gone on in the past. I
hope Peter that you concur as I have Posted with all good intention - and
hopefully to the benefit of all. The purpose of my Posts, is to enable a brief
interlude from quietness and gnrl. business, and I hope my intentions will be
appreciated? - furthermore it is a direct insight into the current operations
of the Mnrl. Ind..
There are indeed many very commendable highly technical successful rounds in
the two Links, but whilst saying this there are numerous highly recommendable
errors as well! - accidental or otherwise.
Using the Link ID and time, who can identify which? Peter will call an end
to this as/when he sees fit, but I hope Members will treated/consider this
interlude with the entertainment and spirit that it is offered.
Regards, Bernard
|