JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Archives


LCG-ROLLOUT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT Home

LCG-ROLLOUT  November 2008

LCG-ROLLOUT November 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Slightly OT] 802.3ad bonding with SL4 and Nortel 5510 switches

From:

John Bland <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

LHC Computer Grid - Rollout <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:29:37 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (208 lines)

Hi,

If you're using layer2 hashing with LACP then a single host mac address 
will always go through the same bonded interface. If your tests are 
between just two machines you will see this. If your machines are 
communicating over layer3 then this will always be the case unless you 
use layer2+3 or layer3+4 hashing (but as you're using a Class B network 
I expect you don't use any routing between hosts).

Try some more transfers from different hosts. The load should show up as 
being spread across the different interfaces eg a bond on one of our 
storage servers has:

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:78:78:51
           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:9000  Metric:1
           RX packets:97249688 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:156006915 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:165088109873 (153.7 GiB)  TX bytes:1232485987864 
(1.1 TiB)

eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:78:78:51
           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:9000  Metric:1
           RX packets:87233076 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:159241749 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:171713805781 (159.9 GiB)  TX bytes:1268111167924 
(1.1 TiB)

eth3      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:78:78:51
           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:9000  Metric:1
           RX packets:94892104 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
           TX packets:160132801 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
           RX bytes:173511432378 (161.5 GiB)  TX bytes:1266240156168 
(1.1 TiB)

John

Andrew Elwell wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Middleware related in that we're trying to use link aggregation on our 
> new disk servers with SLC4X
> 
> I've set up the servers as follows:
> 
> /etc/modprobe.conf
> alias eth0 igb
> alias eth1 igb
> alias bond0 bonding
> options bond0 mode=4 miimon=100
> 
> and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ are:
> ifcfg-eth0    
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> ONBOOT=yes
> MASTER=bond0
> SLAVE=yes
> ISALIAS=no
> 
> ifcfg-eth1
> DEVICE=eth1
> BOOTPROTO=none
> ONBOOT=yes
> MASTER=bond0
> SLAVE=yes
> ISALIAS=no
> 
> ifcfg-bond0
> DEVICE=bond0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> ONBOOT=yes
> IPADDR=10.141.245.48
> NETMASK=255.255.0.0
> USERCTL=no
> 
> 
> which all seem to come up OK
> 
> disk048:~# ifconfig
> bond0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:48:C3:26:7A
>           inet addr:10.141.245.48  Bcast:10.141.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fec3:267a/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:242700760 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:103425281 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:367020039578 (341.8 GiB)  TX bytes:5588397361 (5.2 GiB)
> 
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:48:C3:26:7A
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:242700443 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:103423303 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:367020031506 (341.8 GiB)  TX bytes:5588285549 (5.2 GiB)
>           Memory:d8220000-d8240000
> 
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:48:C3:26:7A
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:335 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:1987 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:35324 (34.4 KiB)  TX bytes:112506 (109.8 KiB)
>           Memory:d8260000-d8280000
> 
> 
> disk048:~# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v2.6.3-rh (June 8, 2005)
> 
> Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
> MII Status: up
> MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
> Up Delay (ms): 0
> Down Delay (ms): 0
> 
> 802.3ad info
> LACP rate: slow
> Active Aggregator Info:
>     Aggregator ID: 1
>     Number of ports: 2
>     Actor Key: 17
>     Partner Key: 16432
>     Partner Mac Address: 00:22:67:7d:c0:00
> 
> Slave Interface: eth0
> MII Status: up
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: 00:30:48:c3:26:7a
> Aggregator ID: 1
> 
> Slave Interface: eth1
> MII Status: up
> Link Failure Count: 0
> Permanent HW addr: 00:30:48:c3:26:7b
> Aggregator ID: 1
> 
> 
> 
> from the switch end it looks reasonable too:
> 
> stack02#show lacp port 3/27-28
>                                        Admin Oper         Trunk Partner
> Unit/Port Priority Lacp    A/I Timeout Key   Key   AggrId Id    Port    
> Status
> --------- -------- ------- --- ------- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------- 
> ------
> 3/27      32768    Passive A   Long    48    16432 8212   14    1       
> Active
> 3/28      32768    Passive A   Long    48    16432 8212   14    2       
> Active
> stack02#show lacp aggr 8212
> Aggr ID:  8212
>     Trunk:  14
>     Status         :  Enabled
>     Type           :  LA
>     Actor Lag ID   :  8000-0022677DC000-4030
>     Partner Lag ID :  FFFF-003048C3267A-0011
>     Members        :  3/27-28
>     Standby Members:  NONE
> 
> 
> stack02#show lacp stats 3/27-28
> Unit/Port 3/27      -------------------------------------
>                LACPDUs Rx:             216
>                LACPDUs Tx:             217
>                MarkerPDUs Rx:          0
>                MarkerResponsePDUs Rx:  0
>                MarkerPDUs Tx:          0
>                MarkerResponsePDUs Tx:  0
>                UnknownPDUs Rx:         0
>                IllegalPDUs Rx:         0
> Unit/Port 3/28      -------------------------------------
>                LACPDUs Rx:             208
>                LACPDUs Tx:             207
>                MarkerPDUs Rx:          0
>                MarkerResponsePDUs Rx:  0
>                MarkerPDUs Tx:          0
>                MarkerResponsePDUs Tx:  0
>                UnknownPDUs Rx:         0
>                IllegalPDUs Rx:         0
> 
> 
> 
> but, despite all of the above the ifconfig shows that nearly all of the 
> traffic is going through eth0 .. is this to be expected ot is it a 
> side-effect of globus-gridftp-server?
> 
> Hopefully there's some networky person on the list who can point me to 
> any mistakes
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Dr John Bland, Systems Administrator
Room 220, Oliver Lodge
Particle Physics Group, University of Liverpool
Mail: [log in to unmask]
Tel : 0151 794 2911
"I canna change the laws of physics, Captain!"

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
November 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager