Hi - did you get to the bottom of this? Is it possibly a file system /
quota / etc problem? If you want to upload the directories we could
look into this if it still doesn't make sense.
Cheers.
On 8 Nov 2008, at 22:46, Katie Karlsgodt wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks. I am pretty sure I just selected "registration only", I
> can double check I didn't re-run post-stats, or maybe it is best
> just to run them all again from scratch. I know that the design.con
> files are all identical, which is why the error is so mysterious-- I
> looped through and checked each one against the first one using
> "diff", and the text in each file is identical. Is there anything
> else that makes that particular error appear?
> thanks,
> Katie
>
> On Nov 8, 2008, at 2:18 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just tested a mini-example and re-running registration-only
>> doesn't seem to cause a problem for higher-level analyses. Is it
>> possible that you reran poststats as well as registration? Can you
>> check the design.con files to see which ones don't look right?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
>> On 7 Nov 2008, at 21:03, Katie Karlsgodt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I just recently switched to fsl4 and am having some problems
>>> (using 4.1.1). I ran a group of 25 subjects, all in the same feat
>>> batch with the exact same parameters. I then re-ran registration-
>>> only on all of the same subjects, registering them to the same
>>> common brain. Now I'm trying to run a group analysis of the same
>>> subjects. It starts off fine, but then I get this error:
>>>
>>> /space/raid/fmri/fsl-4.1.1-centos4_64/bin/fslmaths varcope1 -mas
>>> mask varcope1
>>> Error - not all input FEAT directories have valid and compatible
>>> design.con contrast files.
>>>
>>> The problem is, I can't figure out what the problem is. All
>>> subjects were run together, and I checked with diff and there was
>>> no difference between any of their design.con files. Is there some
>>> other way to arrive at this error? I tried checking permissions,
>>> none of the files are zipped, I just created all this morning in
>>> the same version of fsl I'm using for the group, and I'm not sure
>>> where else to look. Is it possible that fsl4 can't run group
>>> analyses if registration-only has been run after the initial
>>> contrasts were run? Any pointers to where I can look would be much
>>> appreciated!
>>> thanks,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________
>>> Katie Karlsgodt, Ph.D.
>>> Post Doctoral Fellow, Neurogenetics Affinity Group
>>> Semel Institute
>>> University of California, Los Angeles
>>>
>>> phone: 310-794-9673
>>> fax: 310-794-9740
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
>> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>>
>> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
>> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
>> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________
> Katie Karlsgodt, Ph.D.
> Post Doctoral Fellow, Neurogenetics Affinity Group
> Semel Institute
> University of California, Los Angeles
>
> phone: 310-794-9673
> fax: 310-794-9740
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|