> in fact, and though I understand the desire not to go too far into the
> bushes, I think we ignore those concerns at our peril.
Bit late getting back on this - my feeling was that the document got
this just about right in terms of the example - walking a line between
ensuring appeal to those from the library world (choosing bib data as
the example, giving LCSH as an example of a vocab) while showing how
DCAP can enable metadata schemes to be used together (exploiting FOAF
and dcterms).
It seems like you feel it could go further in pre-emptively tackling
some of the fears that we know/anticipate in the library community. I
understand this, but I'm not sure I feel this document is the right
place for it. Happy to gently disagree with you on this :)
Owen
|