Of course I am sorry that you feel personally insulted by my message,
Christopher. And of course I don't mind a conversation with your lawyers.
Best,
Judy
2008/10/27 Christopher C Jones <[log in to unmask]>
> Judy, as I see it you have two options. The first is to apologise for
> the personal insult and the second is the continue this conversion with
> my lawyers.
>
> Yours faithfully,
>
> Christopher C. Jones.
>
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 06:08 -0400, Judy Prince wrote:
> > Christopher, given the screams behind this narrative, it sounds like it
> may
> > be a slice of your life, perhaps grossly fiction'ed, but fundamentally
> > described. I'd urge you to stop behaving this way; it's harmful, sad,
> > wasteful of talents, time and energy. Perhaps you feel addicted to these
> > things as the only substitutes for love and creativity you can manage at
> > this time. You may ache for those times when you had no need for the
> > addictions, didn't even give them a thought, but felt free, creative,
> loving
> > and hopeful.
> > Choose, then, to be wise and helpful to yourself. The past is finished,
> > over and done; it has no residue that will linger and hold you back if
> you
> > choose to move forward in the ways you know are best for you.
> >
> > No one wants to see you suffer in the ways you describe. None of us on
> this
> > list is ignorant of the world you talk of, nor of the desperate
> addictions.
> > As you can well imagine, we've had our shares of pervasive terror. We
> have
> > often felt undeserving, unworthy, hurt and angry to the core of our
> beings.
> > We have felt that it's 'the human condition', and have thought it
> > impossible to turn around to the positives we've known at other times.
> But
> > the 'human condition' is much larger than negatives and naked terror.
> For
> > all your knowings, you know that. Go on, then, and choose the
> > positives---keep choosing them every minute, every morning. Be
> steadfast,
> > and God bless you in your continuous positive choosings.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Judy
> >
> > 2008/10/26 Christopher C Jones <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > > Ha, but Judy, us magazine editors are not concerned with such lowly
> > > matters as spel(l)ing which is left to the lower orders of copy editors
> > > and proofreaders (why else do we hire suck things for???) but rather
> the
> > > more delicate matters of cutting up and snorting coke on the toilet
> seat
> > > with the art director while we decide which journalist and photographer
> > > we will send to interview and photograph yet another boring Hollywood
> > > A-lister in such a why that it fits neatly around the space our
> > > proprietor who as the son of a big media magnate would expect us to do,
> > > while also smoking four paper joints in Ocean Street, a well known
> > > street in the most elite inner circle eastern Sydney suburbs with this
> > > son proprietor who is wearing a dress we describe as a caftan to so he
> > > then cannot be accused of wearing a dress and as such cross dressing in
> > > a way not befitting of an heir to a multinational media conglomerate
> > > which then allows ample room for advertising agencies acting on behalf
> > > of other big mega mega bucks corporations who they convince they have
> > > got the lowest ad-space rate available for all history to advertise
> > > their lowly wears (mostly upmarket designer clothing shit-oopsstuff, to
> > > be precise) and to pay quite a lot more indeed quite a lot more for
> then
> > > the costs we have conferred on our white powder toilet seats smelling
> of
> > > the same diesel oil which I put into the tank of my crimson red
> Mercedes
> > > sports sedan.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:57 -0400, Judy Prince wrote:
> > > > Did I mention, Christopher, that my reading level's on par with most
> 3rd
> > > > graders? I'll need a big boost of CLEAR explaining even before
> tackling
> > > > what I fear is not 'DESSERT' but a dusty desert of clunky
> translations.
> > > > YAK!
> > > > Spelchek Judy
> > >
>
|