I am probably again out of my depths here but here are my tuppence
worth of thoughts on the discussion.
I think it would be specially interesting to study "isomorphic open
spaces". I think that "visual accessibility" frameworks (i.e. graphs) are
perhaps more amenable for isomorphisms. I have a hunch that Tony's
graph could be related to "physical accessibility". For example e.g.
gates (with bars) in a prison are visually transparent but physically
opaque to prisoners or something like the phrase "glass ceiling" i.e.
it can be seen through (thus aesethetically and emotionally appealing
hence influencing our *choices* in navigation?) but cannot be passed.
Sanjay.
|