Dear Gwenaelle and Steve,
Thank you so much for your suggestions.
When I used fslsplit (I am pretty sure I use the right commands), again the
values of single images did not correspond to the original 4D file in
volumes above 70th.
However, what I did is fslmeants on a single voxel from the
all_FA_skeletonized. These values DID correspond to those in fsl-splitted
files, but did not correspond to values in the all_FA_skeeltonized (from
which they originated) when viewed in fslview.
My conclusion is that fslview displays incorrect values from a certain
volume in my large all_FA_skeletonized file (143 "timepoins"), but the
values in the files are correct. So, working on values displayed in flsview
would not be secure, but extracting values with fslutils is safe.
Is it possible? Or shall I check the files in yet another way?
Best,
Aga
On 10/28/08 7:33 PM, "Gwenaëlle DOUAUD" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Aga,
>
>> I wanted to do it for 2 subgroups of my sample
>> separately, but
>> I am not able to split the all_FA_skeletonized file (here I
>> am referring to
>> my email "Fslroi on all_FA_skeletonised - output does
>> not match the input").
> I haven't quite followed this exchange of emails, but have you tried the -
> rather painful - approach of splitting the all_FA_skeletonised (fslsplit) then
> reconcatenating them in the correct order (looking at the correspondence
> between all_FA and each normalised FA map in FA/ for instance)?
>
> Cheers,
> Gwenaelle
>
>
>
|