> I believe also that in an earlier posting Peter Zwart said he thought
> that CNS doesn't take account of the Wilson distribution when doing its
> version of the correction; if this is true (and I have no independent
> evidence that it is since I'm not a CNS user), then the above argument
> implies that the F's corrected by such a procedure will inevitably be
> biased, though the damage done may well not be significant compared with
> that done by using F's instead of I's in the first place.
>
Actually, this is an option in phenix.reflection_file_converter
(massage_intensities) and its use is discouraged by forcing the user
to use a multitude of keywords at the same time to perform this.
That said, I do use this option inside xtriage for space group
determination purposes. At the moment it is a quick hack, and
something more suitabvle to overcome current limitations is imminent.
P
|