JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  August 2008

LIS-PROFESSION August 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

UK: Freedom of Information requests website

From:

Mark Perkins lists <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mark Perkins lists <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:37:36 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (293 lines)

Introduction to WhatDoTheyKnow
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/

What is WhatDoTheyKnow for?
To help you find out inside information about what the UK government is
doing.
	
How does the site work?
You choose the public authority that you would like information from, then
write a brief note describing what you want to know. We then send your
request to the public authority. Any response they make is automatically
published on the website for you and anyone else to find and read. 
	
Why would I bother to do this?
You pay taxes, and then government does things with the money. All sorts of
things that affect your life, from healthcare through to national
defence. Some it does badly, some it does well. The more we find out about
how government works, the better able we are to make suggestions to
improve the things that are done badly, and to celebrate the things that are
done well. 
	
Why would the public authority bother to reply?
Under Freedom of Information (FOI) law, they have to respond. 
	
Who makes it?
WhatDoTheyKnow is created and run by mySociety <http://www.mysociety.org/> ,
and was initially funded by the JRSST Charitable Trust
<http://www.mysociety.org/2006/12/06/funding-for-freedom-of-information/> .
mySociety is a project of the registered charity UK Citizens Online
Democracy <http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UK_Citizens_Online_Democracy> . If you
like what we're doing, then you can make a donation
<https://secure.mysociety.org/donate/>  


Making requests


You're missing the public authority that I want to request from!
Please contact us <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact>  with the
name of the public authority and, if you can find it, their contact email
address for Freedom of Information requests. If you'd like to help add a
whole category of public authority to the site, for example all primary
care trusts or all schools, then please edit this shared spreadsheet
<http://tinyurl.com/2cep8a>  (Google account required). 
	
How quickly will I get a response?
By law public authorities must respond "promptly", and in any event not
later than 20 working days after receiving your request. The date of that
hard limit is shown on the page for your request. You will be emailed if
this date goes by without a response, so you can send the public authority
another note to remind them that they are breaking the law. Note: If you had
to clarify your request, the clock starts from that date, instead of 	the
date they received your initial request. 
	
What if I'm not satisfied with the response?
If you didn't get the information you asked for, or you didn't get it in
time, then read our page 'Unhappy about the response you got?
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/unhappy> '. 
	
Can you tell me more of the nitty gritty about the process of making
requests?
Have a look at the access to official information
<http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/access_to_official_information.aspx>
pages on the 
Information Commisioner's website. 
	
Can I request information about myself?
Not using this site. Requests made using WhatDoTheyKnow are public, made
under the Freedom of Information Act, and cannot help you find information
about a private individual. If you would like to know what information a
public authority holds about yourself, you should make a "Subject Access
Request" in private using Data Protection law. The leaflet Subject Access -
A guide for data subjects
<http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_ap
plication/subject_access_-_guide_for_data_subjects.pdf>  (on the Information
Commisioner's website) explains how to do this. 
	
I'd like to keep my request secret! (At least until I publish my story)
WhatDoTheyKnow is currently only designed for public requests. All responses
that we receive are automatically published on the website for anyone to
read. You should contact the public authority directly if you would like to
make a request in private. If you're interested in buying a system which
helps you manage FOI requests in secret, then contact us
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact> . 
	
Why can I only request information about the environment from some
authorities?
Some public authorities, such as South East Water
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/south_east_water> , don't come under the
Freedom of Information Act, but do come under another law called the
Environmental Information Regulations (EIR). It's a very similar law, so you
make a request to them using WhatDoTheyKnow in just the same way as an FOI
request. The only difference is that on the page where you write you
request, it reminds you that you can only request "environmental
information" and tells you what that means. It is quite broad. 
	
So can I request information using EIR from other authorities?
Yes, just make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request as normal. The
authority has a duty to work out if the Environmental Information
Regulations (EIR) is the more appropriate legislation to reply under. 


Privacy questions

Who gets to see my email address?
We will not disclose your email address to anyone, including the public
authority you are sending a request to, unless we are obliged to by law, or
you ask us to. If you send a message to another user on the site, then it
will reveal your email address to them. You will be told that this is going
to happen. 
	
Will you send nasty, brutish spam to my email address?
Nope. After you sign up to WhatDoTheyKnow we will only send you emails
relating to a request you made, an email alert that you have signed up for,
or for other reasons that you specifically authorise. We will never give or
sell your email addresses to anyone else, unless we are obliged to by law,
or you ask us to. 
	
Why will my name appear publically on the site?
It means that someone researching the same area can get in touch with you,
and maybe give you more information or ideas relating to your request. Also,
we're going to publish the response with the name of the civil servant who
wrote it, so it seems only fair that your name should be public too!
Therefore, we encourage you to use your real name, but you may use a
pseudonym if you would like to be anonymous. 
	
So I can make an FOI request using a pseudonym?
It is good practice for the public authority to reply to an anonymous
request, except in special circumstances such as if they suspect you of
making vexatious requests. See Freedom of Information Good Practice Guidance
No 6
<http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/detai
led_specialist_guides/motive_blind_v1.0_25_10_071.pdf>  for details. You
should refer to this if a public authority attempts to refuse a request
because you used a pseudonym. However, there are good reasons to use your
real name: see the previous question. If nothing else, it avoids the risk of
an authority being picky, ignoring the guidance and refusing your request. 

They've asked for my postal address!
If a public authority asks you for your full, physical address, reply to
them saying that section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an "address for
correspondence", and that the email address you are using is sufficient. The
Ministry of Justice has guidance on this
<http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foi-procedural-what.htm>  - "As well as
hard copy written correspondence, requests that are transmitted
electronically (for example, in emails) are acceptable ... If a request is
received by email and no postal address is given, the email address should
be treated as the return address." As if that isn't enough, the Information
Commissioner's Hints for Practitioners
<http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/pract
ical_application/foi_hints_for_practitioners_handing_foi_and_eir_requests_20
08_final.pdf>  say "Any correspondence could include a request for
information. If it is written (this includes e-mail), legible, gives the
name of the applicant, an address for reply (which could be electronic), and
includes a description of the information required, then it will fall within
the scope of the legislation." 

No no, they need a postal address to send a paper response!
If an authority only has a paper copy of the information that you want, they
may ask you for a postal address. To start with, try persuading them to scan
in the documents for you. You can even offer to gift them a scanner
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/car_parking_charges_policy_and_a#outg
oing-532> , which in that particular case embarrassed the authority into
finding one they had already. If that doesn't work, and you want to provide
your postal address privately in order to receive the documents, then please
contact us <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact> .

How do you moderate request annotations?
Annotations on WhatDoTheyKnow are to help people get the information they
want, or to give them pointers to places they can go to help them act on it.
We reserve the right to remove anything else. Endless, political discussions
are not allowed. Post a link to a suitable forum or campaign site elsewhere.

	
FOI officer questions


I just got here from bottom of an FOI request, what is going on?
WhatDoTheyKnow is a service run by a charity. It helps ordinary members of
the public make FOI requests, and easily track and share the responses. The
FOI request you received was made by someone using WhatDoTheyKnow. You can
simply reply to the request as you would any other request from an
individual. The only difference is that your response will be automatically
published on the Internet. If you have privacy or other concerns, please
read the answers below. You might also like to read this page from the top
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about>  to find out more about what the
site does from the point of view of a user. You can also search the site to
find the authority that you work for, and view the status of any requests
made using the site. Finally, we welcome comments and thoughts from FOI
officers, please get in touch <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact> .


Why are you publishing responses to FOI requests?
We think there are lots of benefits. Most importantly it will encourage the
public to be more interested and involved in the work of government. We also
hope that it will reduce the number of duplicate requests on any subject
that a public body will receive. Given that Freedom of Information responses
contain public information, which anybody could easily request again from
the public authority, we think there should be no reason not to publish it
widely. 
	
Are the people making requests real people?
Yes. For the purposes of keeping track of responses we use
computer-generated email addresses for each request. However, before they
can send a request, each user must register on the site with a unique email
address that we then verify. You can search this site and find a page
listing all requests that each person has made. 
	
An email isn't a sufficient address for an FOI request!
Yes it is. This letter from the ICO to Rother District Council
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/200808061
00741260.pdf>  gives guidance on the matter, specifically in the context of
requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow. 
	
Aren't you making lots of vexatious requests?
WhatDoTheyKnow is not making any requests. We are sending requests on behalf
of our users, who are real people making the requests. Look at it like this
- if lots of different people made requests from different Hotmail email
addresses, then you would not think that Microsoft were making vexatious
requests. It is exactly the same if lots of requests are made via
WhatDoTheyKnow. Moreover, since all requests are public it is much easier
for you to see if one of our users is making vexatious requests, and for us
to block them when that happens. If that isn't enough for you, the letter
from the ICO to Rother District Council
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1142/response/2894/attach/5/200808061
00741260.pdf>  gives some guidance on the matter.

Isn't it a problem that you publish the names of civil servants and the text
of emails?
Officers or servants responding to requests are doing so on behalf of the
public as part of their job, and we publish their response on that basis.
Usually the names and phone numbers of FOI officers are already available on
authority websites. We also encourage our users to give their real name too,
so it is fair both ways. 
	
Do you publish email addresses or mobile phone numbers?
We automatically remove email addresses and labelled mobile phone numbers
that are in the email part of responses from public authorities. Please
contact us <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact>  if we've missed
one. We don't currently remove these from attachments, such as Word
documents. 
	
Can you take down private information about me?
If you see any information on the site which you'd like us to remove or
hide, then please let us know <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/contact> .
We'll then remove it, provided it is genuinely private information. 


Credit where credit is due

Which people made WhatDoTheyKnow?
	
Oh, nearly everyone (and maybe you too
<http://www.mysociety.org/volunteertasks> )! 

	*	Heather Brooke <http://www.yrtk.org/>  (vampy!
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/mar/29/houseofcommons.michaelmartin
?gusrc=rss&feed=worldnews> ) has been pushing the idea of a UK FOI archive
for years now. 
	*	Both Phil Rodgers and Francis Irving
<http://www.flourish.org/blog/>  entered it in a mySociety competition for
ideas for public interest websites to build. 
	*	It won
<http://www.mysociety.org/2006/09/27/the-mysociety-call-for-proposals-the-wi
nner-and-runners-up/> , and then Chris Lightfoot (RIP :(
<http://mk.ucant.org/archives/000129.html> ) thought up the wheeze of
intercepting email responses to requests and automatically publishing them. 
	*	Tom Steinberg got the cash to pay for the site from a dead
chocolate mogul <http://www.jrrt.org.uk/jrsstct.htm>  (thank you!) ... 
	*	... so that Francis Irving, Angie Ahl, Tommy Martin, Louise
Crow, Matthew Somerville and Tom Steinberg could do the complex mixture of
design and coding to build what you see today. 
	*	Thanks particularly to Julian Todd (great blog!
<http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/> ), Francis Davey, and Etienne Pollard
for using the site early on and giving feedback (and/or legal advice!), and
also to all our other users and testers. 
	*	Lots of people have been looking up FOI email addresses, and
a few volunteering to run the site - most especially Adam McGreggor, Alex
Skene, John Cross and Tony Bowden. 
	*	Finally we couldn't do any of this without those crazy
people <http://www.ukcod.org.uk/UKCOD_Trustees>  who volunteer, amongst many
other things, to do the accounts and fill in our VAT return. 

	You're all stars. 



----
Mark Perkins MLIS, MCLIP
www.markperkins.info

https://keyserver.pgp.com/ 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager