Hi CRISIS FORUM,

The same old arguments about WHO PAYS and WHO IS DEVELOPED are cropping up again. With a twist...

=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=

http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnLS644425.html

Rich or poor? New faultline in U.N. climate talks
Thu 28 Aug 2008, 13:24 GMT
By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

ACCRA, Aug 28 (Reuters) - Rich countries are pushing developing
nations with the strongest economies to do far more to combat climate
change, opening a faultline between rich and poor in U.N. talks on
global warming.

The European Union, for instance, says that some developing nations
such as Singapore, Argentina and some OPEC states have grown richer
than some developed nations which have to shoulder the burden of cuts
in greenhouse gas emissions.

"We want some of the developing nations to do more," said Brice
Lalonde of France, who led the EU delegation at Aug. 21-27 talks among
160 nations on a broader new climate treaty to be agreed by the end of
2009.

"There needs to be more differentiation among developing nations," he said.

The current fight against climate change is led by 37 developed
nations in the Kyoto Protocol who have agreed to cut emissions by five
percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12. Developing nations have no
targets.

Many poor nations, which negotiate in a bloc at U.N. talks,
strongly oppose any attempt by the rich to redefine the boundary
between rich and poor, seeing it as a diversion from a need for the
rich to make ever deeper cuts in emissions.

"The (1992 U.N. Climate) Convention did not provide for
differentiation between developing countries," said Byron Blake of
Antigua and Barbuda, chair of a group of more than 130 developing
nations in Accra known as the G77 and China.

Any such talk would be a "diversion of effort", he told Reuters.
Rich nations have to agree deeper cuts in greenhouse gases, mainly from
burning fossil fuels, to slow impacts such as heatwaves, floods,
desertification and rising seas.

The European Union, Japan and Australia are among nations that say
it is unfair to expect the rich group from almost two decades ago to
keep on taking the lead. Kyoto groups all rich nations except the
United States, which rejected the pact.

NEW WORLD ORDER

Since the early 1990s, non-Kyoto countries such as Mexico and South
Korea have joined the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development, grouping rich nations.

Non-Kyoto nations such as Argentina or Qatar have higher per capita
incomes than insiders Russia or some eastern EU members. And by some
World Bank yardsticks of purchasing power, non-Kyoto Singapore has
higher per capita income than the United States.

"Most developing countries are not in favour of differentiation,"
Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat, told Reuters.
"I can't predict where that debate is going to go."

A new treaty will demand deeper cuts from developed nations by 2020
and only "actions" by developing nations to slow the rise of their
emissions.

"It's a real chicken and egg situation," said Angela Anderson of
the Washington-based Pew Environment Group, with both rich and poor
wanting the other to promise more. "It is a big divide."

Developed nations say limited funds must focus on the poorest, such as in sub-Saharan Africa.

But Blake said rich nations should focus on keeping past promises
to help the developing nations, which have contributed least to
greenhouse gas emissions since the Industrial Revolution and now need
to burn energy to end poverty.

"Nations with binding commitments have not, I repeat have not, delivered on those commitments," he said.

Some nations outside Kyoto are promising to do more. South Korea
says, for instance, that it plans to set a binding target for emissions
and wants to act as a bridge between the developing and developed
nations.

And South Africa has laid out a scenario that could mean a peak in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2020-25.

Splitting up developing nations "is going to be an issue for
further discussions," said Harlan Watson, head of the U.S. delegation.

Developing nations are unanimous in saying they cannot be expected
to do more when the United States has no goals. Both candidates to
succed President George W. Bush, Republican John McCain and Democrat
Barack Obama, say they will do more.

-- For Reuters latest environment blogs click on: http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/ (Editing by Diana Abdallah)

=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=

jo.
+44 77 17 22 13 96
http://www.changecollege.org.uk
_________________________________________________________________
Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search 
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/