JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  August 2008

CCP4BB August 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: AW: [ccp4bb] hi / cloning stuff

From:

Sridhar Prasad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sridhar Prasad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:28:21 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (50 lines)

I want to draw attention to some of the early unruly response(s) to this question.

First of all, no one is forcing anyone to respond to each and every message that is posted on the CCP4 bulletin board.

If you are so keen on responding, please be respectful and considerate and think twice before you click on the send icon on your computer with derogatory remarks.


Thanks
Sridhar Prasad

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Jan Schoepe
Sent: Sat 8/30/2008 8:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] hi / cloning stuff
 
Hi, I think your question is quite reasonable no matter what others say about it. There were even people asking about how to make buffers and then a big discussion about the HH equation arose. And we should not forget that modern crystallization starts with cloning ;-) Anyway, you should have given us some more details about your experiments (cells, vectors etc.) and maybe a better subject.
If you want to clone "something", it is a good idea to do it in silico (e.g. with Clone Manager or Vector NTI) before you walk into a wet lab to check, that things can work as desired or if there are fishy things like internal restriction sides etc.
Let me tell you a story from my PhD thesis, maybe this will help you somehow. I started with cloning 10 genes into a before modified pET vector (for E. coli overexpression). After cleavage of the vector I got cohesive ends ("sticky ends"). The genes were PCR amplified from the chromosome of another bacterium. So things should have been very straight forward. Sticky ends should make sure that the amplified genes were inserted in the right direction and the cleaved vector should not ligate without the insert (and of course there was antibiotic selection). But what I observed was often quite different from that. Often agar plates stayed empty after transformation. That means, the cells were not able to grow, because there was no vector in the cells that made them be able to survive on the antibiotic plates. When I got colonies, the DNA gel looked very strange (not possible to interpret) or the vector closed without the insert. In this case, E. coli seems
 to be able to "repair" the cohesive ends. Finally, I got it done but it took me months. In one case, a plate seemed to be empty but I did not wanted to throw it away so I let it stay a litte longer (~another day?, I do not remeber exactly, but it was for a long time...) at 37° C than just over night (~0.5-1 days). Finally, one single colony showed up and it was one of the right ones. With another vector it might be possible to do the same thing within weeks. This is just cloning luck.
Another story, even if it could be embarassing to mention it here. In one case, I got an Xtal structure but then I wanted to do some more activity tests. I found out that my glycerol stocks were not alright any more and I had no plasmid backups (do it!!!). So I had to clone, again. But in this case I used a cloning kit from Qiagen (I have no commercial interests here). I got the insert into the cloning vector from Qiagen very easily. Then I was able to amplify it as much as I wanted and the ligation procedure was not so dependent from the yield of the PCR reaction (high molar access of insert compared to the cleaved vector) . Also in this case, cloning into the expresson vector was not completely trivial (maybe 1-1.5 months) but much easier than without this kit. So, it might be an idea to use a kit that you can amplify your insert as much as you want. I know that these kits a pricy but your time is also expensive and you also use/waste a lot of
 chemicals for unsuccessful trials.
After I finished my thesis, another PhD student started to work with these vectors and tried it for more than one year and then gave it up! So this vector really seems to be a tough one. Thats why if nothing works, you might take another vector into consideration. But before that you should check buffers, ligase, restriction enzymes etc. and do in silico cloning. Another idea would be do to de/phosphorylation (see textbooks).

Good luck!
Jan

--- vijay srivastava <[log in to unmask]> schrieb am Sa, 30.8.2008:
Von: vijay srivastava <[log in to unmask]>
Betreff: [ccp4bb] hi
An: [log in to unmask]
Datum: Samstag, 30. August 2008, 13:04


hi
i am facing problem in cloning,getting my insert and vector at the
correct position after digestion but after ligation colony is not
coming and if how it is coming than i am not getting my insert
 




       Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager