Truncate output does by default contain I (aka F^2) columns
Phil
On 20 Aug 2008, at 20:25, George M. Sheldrick wrote:
> Ian,
>
> SHELXL users would also be very happy if mtz files routinely
> contained <F^2> and its esd, but I had long regarded this as a
> lost cause.
>
> George
>
> Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
> Dept. Structural Chemistry,
> University of Goettingen,
> Tammannstr. 4,
> D37077 Goettingen, Germany
> Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
> Fax. +49-551-39-22582
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Ian Tickle wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> You can just run Truncate again, exactly as you did before, but this
>> time using your truncated.mtz file as input, since it contains the
>> same
>> IMEAN/SIGIMEAN columns output by Scala. It will also give you
>> another
>> output mtz file which should be identical to your input mtz (but I
>> haven't tested this!). Truncate will also allow you to assign the
>> F/SIGF columns to get a Wilson plot (but no output mtz), but note
>> that
>> this is formally incorrect since squaring <F> is not the same as
>> using
>> <F^2> (i.e. <F^2> = <F>^2 + var(F)).
>>
>> It seems to me that it would be better if in fact Truncate did
>> write out
>> a <F^2> column (as well as <F>), because this should really be used
>> in
>> place of <F>^2 in Molecular Replacement, native Patterson, F^2 based
>> refinement, or indeed anywhere where F^2 is demanded (note that using
>> Imeas doesn't help because obviously it's not the same as <F^2>
>> either).
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> -- Ian
>>
>>> If I've lost my SCALA MTZ, and have only the truncated.mtz
>>> for my dataset, which program is the quickest means of
>>> obtaining a Wilson plot?
>>>
>>> Thank you again,
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Wed, 8/20/08, Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Lower completeness, decent R factors,
>>> but low B factor...
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008, 4:30 AM
>>>> James Pauff wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a refined structure at 2.6 angstroms that at
>>>> about 73% completeness at this resolution. The I/sigma is
>>>> about 2.0 at 2.6 angstroms, and the omit density for my
>>>> ligands is great contoured at 3.0sigma. My Rcryst is 19 or
>>>> so and the Rfree is 24.5 or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> HOWEVER, my mean B value is 13.9, whereas my other 2
>>>> structures (at 2.2 and 2.3 angstroms, same protein, >95%
>>>> completeness) have mean B values of 22+. Any suggestions as
>>>> to what is going on here? I'm having trouble explaining
>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Have you used TLS - listed B factors will then be given
>>>> relative to the
>>>> TLS parameters. You need to run tLSANL to get a more
>>>> realistic value.
>>>> Eleanor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But in fact temperature factors are rather harder to
>>>> estimate at lower
>>>> resolutions than higher. Look at your <Fo> and
>>>> <Fc> curves v resolution
>>>> ( part of a REFMAC loggraph) and you can see that sometimes
>>>> the overall
>>>> scaling struggles to get a reasonable fit..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer
>> This communication is confidential and may contain privileged
>> information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not
>> be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been
>> sent. If you are not the intended recipient you must not review,
>> use, disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon
>> it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing [log in to unmask]
>> and destroy all copies of the message and any attached documents.
>> Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its
>> messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy.
>> The Company accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward
>> transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Astex
>> Therapeutics domain. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this
>> message are those of the individual sender and not of Astex
>> Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any
>> attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex
>> Therapeutics Ltd accepts no liability for damage caused by any
>> virus transmitted by this email. E-mail is susceptible to data
>> corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, and tampering,
>> Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the basis
>> that the Company is not liable for any such alteration or any
>> consequences thereof.
>> Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge
>> Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674
>>
|