Here, as you have authorised, Joe, is your back channel email to me which
I'd asked you to front channel.
I have no need to respond to it now, as your subsequent front channel
messages make your position, for now, clear to me. Later, either of us or
others, might choose to comment on this, though, I should imagine.
Judy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2008/7/15
Subject: Re: b/c moderation in all things
To: Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>
I see no need to send it to the list. I have copied Anny, Stephen, and
Sharon (Mark is out of town).
jd
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Should you decide to front channel this to petc, I will be glad to reply.
>
> 2008/7/15 Joseph Duemer <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> Wot, Judy, dropped the argot for your attempted impeachment? I'm not
>> going to respond to your bill of particulars except to say that, while I
>> might have handled some situations differently, I did the best I could under
>> the circumstances; further, whatever actions I have taken have been, by my
>> lights, for the good of the list. If I were the arbitrary autocrat you make
>> me out to be, I would have removed you from the list long ago – your
>> embarrassing diction and endlessly irrelevant posts would get you booted
>> from any online forum with which I am familiar. Anny & I have been quite
>> forbearing, as your chatter has cluttered up many discussions as well as the
>> list itself, driving many people to silence and in some cases right off the
>> list. I intend to continue as co-moderator and will not hesitate to limit
>> the sort of irrelevant chatter in which you specialize.
>> jd
>>
>> --
>> Joseph Duemer
>> Professor of Humanities
>> Clarkson University
>> Weblog: sharpsand.net
>>
>
>
--
Joseph Duemer
Professor of Humanities
Clarkson University
Weblog: sharpsand.net
|