JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  June 2008

PHD-DESIGN June 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: A simple definition of 'Design'?

From:

"Swanson, Gunnar" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Swanson, Gunnar

Date:

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:14:18 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (29 lines)

Glenn Johnson asks us to accept a sort of counter tautology by asking "Does a definition indeed have to actually define?" It's an idea that's perhaps supported by the range of non-defining definitions offered here. As much as "many things mean what we individually intend them to mean" is reminiscent of Alice's encounter with Humpty Dumpty, there is -some- truth in the notion. But if "what design means to us individually [is] left to our own imaginations" then we don't have a field, we have a word, and a fairly meaningless one at that.

I've argued here that we don't have -a- field, we have a cluster of fields that have various commonalities. I don't see it as variously intersecting sets; more like intersecting clusters. There's no clear border to, say, graphic design/not graphic design and there are several centers of gravity that variously define or fail to define the field (depending on who you're talking to.) This is complicated by the fact that defining graphic design doesn't pinpoint what part of graphic design is the "design" part. I assume other design fields' definitions are similarly fuzzy and in contention.

Add to that the several definitions of design that Eduardo, Ken, Filippo, I, and others have suggested. (One interesting--and I believe important--one is what Glenn suggested: a relationship with modern production. There is a historical/social connection between that and the design/decoration dichotomy that is one other "definition.")

A few years ago, a friend of mine commented that "There isn't much design in most graphic design." He was applying the strategic planning cluster of design definitions (as opposed to, say, the drawing and formal structuring clusters.)

Thanks to David Durling for the "art & design" explanation. Most graphic design education in the US is in art departments so most of our arguments about the definition of graphic design tend to center around whether and how (graphic) design is like or unlike art. ("Art," of course, suffers from multiple definitions even more than "design" does.) Kathryn Simon asks "What is art? What is design?" I'll let a couple of my favorite writers take a stab at that one.

Kenneth FitzGerald's review <http://www.ephemeralstates.com/2008/06/do-not-read-me-i-am-boring/> of Stefan Sagmeister's -Things I Have Learned So Far in My Life- says "art and design differ only in the segment of the marketplace in which they operate. The essential activity is the same. They just answer to separate validating structures."

Natalia Illyin's "The Man in the Irony Mask" <http://www.stepinsidedesign.com/STEPMagazine/Article/28843> suggests a distinction of attitude: "Contemporary art’s quarter-century-long vogue for taking things apart, for subverting the distinction between 'high and low,' for irony, for pastiche, for the abjuration of concepts of totality, unity and determinate meaning, for fragmentation—well, that vogue never really has sat well with design. We’ve tried, but it just doesn’t. 'Erasing the distinction between art and design,' which we’ve heard so much about in recent years, is impossible for this reason: Design, by its definition, is generative. It is the process of making things. Taking things apart is the opposite of design. Irony—creating distance—is the opposite of real communication, which is the underlying aim of graphic design.

"We designers are a 'making' tribe. Unlike the Dadaists, whose pose we emulate, we live in a world already fragmented. As to the avant-gardism we still lean on--that long-ago radicalism that set out to shake up a Victorian worldview--its notions of chal­lenge and subversion are still important to contemporary art. But the importance of those notions in design has been eclipsed by greater urgencies. We live in a challenged, confused and subverted world. We don’t need to put any burrs under any saddles. We have enough burrs for a lifetime. We have enough distance. The great challenge now is to find relationship."

Gunnar
----------
Gunnar Swanson Design Office
1901 East 6th Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27858

[log in to unmask]
+1 252 258 7006

at East Carolina University:
+1 252 328 2839 
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager