Caroline
Speak to you later - not sure this can be discussed freely in an open forum.
The words you allow to be uttered are important after all -
An impostor has been revealed . . .
"love and do what you will"
mogg
*"Refuse none*, but thou shalt know & destroy the traitors."
wrote:
> Mogg,
>
> No, I'm not trying to wind everyone up at all. Not at all. Why would I
> *want to* wind anybody up? How tedious. (And as if people on this list
> don't get wound up by themselves anyway..). I don't care who has what
> initials or lamen or whatever.
>
> This is being typed in a non-offensive tone, so please don't anyone
> take offence.
>
> And yes, the old "email doesn't covney tone very well" problem has
> obviously occured with my previous post. I thought my post sounded
> exactly as I intended... but I guess I can see why it didn't. Didn't
> you see my inverted commas on the words "authoritive version"? That
> was meant to convey that if the Caliphate OTO has the initials and the
> lamen, then "people" - other people - are going to think they are the
> "authoritive version". Its just a matter of visible brand, people are
> influenced by visible brand or logo. I did not say they *were* the
> authoritive version.
>
> Now what was I even asking, I've forgotten from the shock of being
> misinterpreted!... let me look at my post... OK, I asked "can anyone
> tell me whether there is a similar type of dominant Golden Dawn group
> in operation? Is there one Golden Dawn group that is more visible or
> prevalent or legally powerful than other Golden Dawn groups? And if
> so, on what basis? ie/ traceable lineage, legal power, accident,
> charismatic spokespeople etc."
>
> I don't think that is an offensive question, is it? It seems like a
> realistic question to me.
>
> ninety-three!
>
> ~Caroline.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "mandrake" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 2:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] "Legal" Golden Dawn
>
>
>> Caroline
>>
>> Are you trying to wind everyone up?
>> The hearing was about a trademark and has nothing to do with the
>> status of
>> religious organisations -
>> I'm not sure if you left the quotation marks off by mistake from (now
>> the only OTO) - and you were being ironic??
>> But it is otherwise incredibly inflamatory, as well as factually
>> inaccurate -
>> and IMO should not be on an academic list -
>>
>> "Love and do what you will"
>>
>> mogg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tully wrote:
>>> As the Caliphate OTO (now the only OTO) won the case regarding
>>> ownership of the name OTO (and O.T.O.) and now may seem like it is
>>> the "authoritive version" of the OTO, can anyone tell me whether
>>> there is a similar type of dominant Golden Dawn group in operation?
>>> Is there one Golden Dawn group that is more visible or prevalent or
>>> legally powerful than other Golden Dawn groups? And if so, on what
>>> basis? ie/ traceable lineage, legal power, accident, charismatic
>>> spokespeople etc.
>>> Thanks,
>>> From
>>> Caroline Tully.
>>> http://necropolisnow.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
|