to "that
> fourflusher Crowley' is hardly an academic approach.>>>>>>>>>>>>
yes, lets keep this academic.... so can anyone comment on how something went from a system that was magical but not religious, that was based on pattern and structure, branched off and evolved into a religion with creed?
any academic comments? anyone aware of why, how?
J
ps... can the list master tell me why my auto reply will not set to the list>
|