On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
>> "starmarks". We have a copy of that so I've committed it to obsolete
>> (along with another document, SSN/23).
>
> By coincidence this was the first document I edited this morning in
> docs/ssn. Your one has a stardocdate two years' older than that one but
> doesn't have the LaTeX2HTML upgrade.
Malcolm: Would you mind updating the ssn23 in
applications/obsolete/starbench so that we can delete the ssn23 from the
docs tree?
I've just finished importing all the old documents that we used to have on
the JAC vaxes. No guarantees that they will be the newest versions that
ever existed. Seem to be from around 1994.
Couple of comments:
- I don't see any reason for SUN/119 to be in the installed document
tree. I don't imagine anyone has any CHI questions that need answering.
It should be in docs/obsolete
- The IRAS90 documents are in docs/sun and in applications/obsolete/iras90
Do we really need to install the IRAS90 docs without installing iras90?
I vote they are removed (I have synchronized the versions)
- I deleted the CATPAC, NDPROGS and STARMAN duplicates (the versions with
the source code were retained).
- sun90 was in docs/sun/ and also libraries/snx so I retained the latter.
Maybe some of the Starlink managers have newer/missing documents lying
around that they could contribute for posterity (especially the ADAM
documents which have many holes)?
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|