On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Tim Jenness wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
> >
> >>> "starmarks". We have a copy of that so I've committed it to obsolete
> >>> (along with another document, SSN/23).
> >>
> >> By coincidence this was the first document I edited this morning in
> >> docs/ssn. Your one has a stardocdate two years' older than that one but
> >> doesn't have the LaTeX2HTML upgrade.
> >
> > I've found a version of starbench from 2003 (1.4) on the Starlink FTP
> > server (apparently Steve worked on this), so have updated to that.
> >
> > Pat, this package includes a tar file called slalib_c.tar, which looks
> > like a full release of C SLALIB, except the routines are prefixed by
> > "smb". Is it OK to include this?
> >
>
> We might be able to use the fortran version with it's C wrapper. Assuming
> the starbench doesn't call every SLA C routine.
The code calls about 150 SLALIB routines, so that seems quite comprehensive.
BTW, that should be "sbm" not "smb".
|