JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  April 2008

OCC-HEALTH April 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Fit Notes-The future of Occupational Health Specialist

From:

"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:26:26 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

Hello Sue

I would be interested in reading more about  your particular worries and
those of the practitioners you have met at conferences.

 I see the "Black Report" as not being perfect, there is an emphasis on the
NHS, my experience of the NHS as a provider of health care recently has been
extremely disappointing - can they take this on?

As a starting point for OH, there were lots of things I would have liked to
have seen included which were not eg there was no recommendation to make
access to an OHS a statutory requirement.

Fit notes - this is a better emphasis than a sick note culture. I would like
to see OH being included in the education of all nurses and medics and
particularly so in the education of GPs.

Perhaps the threat to OHNs is the emphasis on Case Management - We could
find our role eroded if we don't watch out. For several years I have been
advocating that OHNs ensure that they are extremely skilled in vocational
rehab.

I don't think the Black report will be the end of OH practice as we know it.
NMC requirements on the content and delivery on OH programmes will have a
greater influence on the focus of OHN practice.

Looking forward to hearing from you, and anyone else who would like to share
their views.

Best

Anne


On 10/4/08 19:25, "Susan Clarke" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Some more pontifications from Sue.......... i am really not happy with
> what I am hearing. Tuesday, I spent an excellent day in London at Imperial
> College for Asthma study day and it was excellent. But much other talk was
> the Black Report and the future of OH. It is not only the OHA's who are
> not happy, the OHP's are not either. Surely, we need to take some radical
> action, before our choices are made for us?
> 
> 
> It seems to me that RCN is now disowning OH and concentrating on the NHS.
> There are two possibilities moving forward: building new alliances and
> adapting, or sit back and watch OH die away as a profession. Putting aside
> the distinct possibility that Gordon Brown's government will be replaced
> in 2009, the main partner for OH could be the BMA. Although both groups
> might question this, there are good reasons for closer collaboration. In
> particular, the Government is again meeting resistance from the BMA about
> implementing vascular screening :
> 
> ** Health screening for the over-40s **
> People aged 40 to 74 will be given key health checks under government
> plans which aim to save 2,000 lives a year.
> < http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/health/7323072.stm >
> 
> 
> . A partnership between the BMA and OH (which now needs a home, IOSH?)
> could create a much better response to rehabilitation etc. (perhaps the
> Australian model?). At present, the doctor's are neither willing nor
> qualified to properly implement the well note / tick box strategy and it
> will fail. Take this example, overheard on a cross country bus service.
> The driver is talking to his colleague whom he is taking to the depot.
> They are irritated by the unfairness of work changes in the company. About
> regional differences in pay, the state of the buses, their suitability for
> cross-country work and so on. Then the case of a co-worker who has been
> long term sick comes up. He's back, but is on 'light duties'. They scoff:
> what does 'light duties' mean? Should he drive or not? If so, how far?
> What should he drive? What shifts should he work? Does he need cover? Is
> it safe? Who is going to assess all that? The GP - in 3 minutes? I think
> not.
>  
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Please remove this footer before replying.
> 
> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
> 
> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
> 
> OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS
> http://OHJobs.drmaze.net
> 
> OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION
> http://www.aohne.org.uk
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.

OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html

CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS
http://OHJobs.drmaze.net

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION
http://www.aohne.org.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager