JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  April 2008

MINING-HISTORY April 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Luckett Miners Barracks - help

From:

Peter King <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:04:14 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (154 lines)

I assume that you have put in your own objection to the planning
application.  If this is done by a local group, it may carry more weight.
Separate objections from several groups will be even better, but they should
not be identical to each other.

Have you considered asking English Heritage to spot-list the building?  In
order to persuade them, it would be desirable to demonstrate that it is an
unusual survival.

My own view is that the best means of preserving historic buildings that
have lost their original function is for them to be converted to another
use, which is often housing.  Nevertheless, it is desirable that the
alterations made should be reversible, in case it is ever desired to restore
the building as a museum.  This in turn means that demolition and rebuilding
should not be allowed, as should the removal of internal walls.

Peter King
49, Stourbridge Road,
Hagley,
Stourbridge
West Midlands
DY9 0QS
01562-720368
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: mining-history [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Caroline Vulliamy
Sent: 19 April 2008 17:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Luckett Miners Barracks - help


Dear List members,

I
hope you may be able to help about this –

Many
of you were very kind indeed some months ago when I put out a request for
information about any surviving Mine Barracks or Lodgings.

I
put together the information you sent (either via the list or to me
directly),
evolved a picture of what survives, and would now like to share some of the
results.

I
was particularly concerned about the possibility of losing the barracks at
Luckett (New Great Consols Mine, in the Tamar Valley, East Cornwall) and the
Cornwall Buildings Preservation Trust was keen to buy the building from the
owners, to be restored as it was and then used in conjunction with the Tamar
Valley AONB Service for educational and community things, linked to the mine
site etc, which would have been great.

However,
before they managed to firm up the agreement, the owners were anxious enough
about it physically to put it up for auction.

The
project described above would still be the ideal outcome for the building.

But
very sadly, there is now an application to basically rebuild it as two
houses,
about to be decided by North Cornwall District Council on 22nd
April, and the current recommendation is approval.



Link
to the application and drawings:…2008/00374
Former Miners Barracks, Pellow, Luckett - renovation &
subdivision of existing building to 2 residential units.

If you wanted to write in support of the County
Archaeologists’ request for a deferment until an archaeological assessment
is
undertaken, e-mails (application no 2008 / 00374) should be sent urgently to
the Planning Officer at North Cornwall District, and copied to Development
Control and the Conservation Officer:

[log in to unmask]

[log in to unmask]



[log in to unmask]



If you wanted to look at the District Council's web-page for more details
of the current recommendations etc, paste the following into your search
engine
or Google -



http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=27516

 - then choose 'Applications for Consideration' at the right of the
screen, and on it go down to item 18, on page 48.



Due to the intention to re-align the central stone partition, the adjoining
original floors in the upper end which hang off it, along with the original
wood partition wall and stair dependant on them – though all complete and
totally solid – seem to be very likely to go, and with them the external
upper
walls and the roof too. This would mean almost all of the original may well
be
demolished and it’s very unlikely that their rebuilt versions would bear
much
relation to the original very natty construction.

I’m
sorry about the short notice, but thought you would want to know !

For
any NAMHO members who came on the walk along the Luckett valley last
summer, you may remember it clearly, dominating the village street just
uphill
from where we had our pasty lunch

This link will take you to several documents on the
Parish web-site which tell you more about this building, its historical
context, what it was like to stay in one, photos of the most similar
examples
(existing and gone), including those protected by listing.

The
job of pasting it all up may still be in progress, but the first photos etc
are
there now – do have a look at the fourth in the list.

Link:
http://www.stokeclimslandparish.org/MinersBarracks.htm

Thankyou
all very much again, and the next thing I’ll aim to add will be all the
collated results, including photos of those from Europe

Meanwhile,
hope you can help !

Caroline
_________________________________________________________________
The next generation of Windows Live is here
http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager