Hi - these scans are reasonable, yes. One has some motion artefacts
but the data is just good enough for SIENA. The result looked plausible.
Cheers.
On 2 Apr 2008, at 18:34, j janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i ran Siena on images A and B, i.e. two T1 images from the same
> scanner and same acquisition protocol, with two years between the
> acquisitions. Siena from FSL 4.0.4 ran without error.
>
> my question: do you think the image-quality of the images is
> sufficient for Siena analysis? is the image-quality too different
> between acquisitions?
>
> i´ve uploaded the images: siena_brains.tar.gz
> ID 787179
>
> thanks,
> -joost
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|