I received notification of this via another listserv and it was presented
as an issue about the future of Geographic Information Science. It is
announced by the NRC as much broader than this. I append below the reply I
made but with a deadline of 30 April the consultation is suspiciously brief
- ie who has been pre-informed, briefs at the ready. Just in case there is
space for Geography as more than refining how we do map-overlays it might
be worth sending responses
Gerry Kearns, Cambridge University, UK
http://dels.nas.edu/besr/SD_questionnaire.cgi
Committee on Strategic Directions for the Geographical Sciences in the Next
Decade: Seeking Input on Research Questions At the request of the National
Science Foundation, the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Geographic
Society, and the Association of American Geographers, the National Research
Council has assembled a committee of experts to formulate a short list of
high priority research questions in the geographical sciences that are
relevant to societal needs. Rather than attempting to cover the breadth of
the field, the goal is to identify a limited number of questions that can
be answered by drawing upon the strengths of the geographical sciences. The
questions should be tractable (i.e. there must be a strong likelihood of
achieving significant and demonstrable progress in the next five to ten
years), and will be written in a clear and compelling way that can be
understood by policymakers, scientists in other disciplines, agency
managers, and the general public.
To help it address its charge, the committee is seeking input on the
following set of questions:
1. What should geographers be studying over the next ten years? Aspects of
this question to consider include:
What makes geographers particularly suited to answer these questions? What
are the consequences of not bringing geographical perspectives to bear on
these questions? What kinds of data or infrastructure are most critical to
the advancement of geographical research? What new sets of skills and
training will geographers need to tackle forthcoming research areas?
2. What are the greatest challenges facing the geographical sciences today?
-----
My response:
Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) proposed that Geography is the study of
the earth as our home. There are many ways that humanity makes itself at
home on earth: transforming physical and biological first nature into
humanised second nature, as Hegel put it; creating meaningful places where
people can establish ontological security ('confidence, continuity and
trust in the world' as one recent study of home ownership has it); building
relations between communities in different places for the exchange of ideas
and goods (what geographers call relations in space). Making ourselves at
home in the world involves, then, nature, place and space. There is no
discipline but Geography that explores these connections so explicitly
although the very best environmental history and social anthropology does
so on occasion.
The questions geographers must address, then, relate to nature, place and
space and are at the heart of many ecological, social and economic
dilemmas. The physical and biological supports of human life are being
threatened by the toxicity of unregulated industry and agriculture. The
sense of community that is at the heart of ontological security is being
undermined by the destruction of place through urban neglect or misguided
redevelopment producing what Fullilove calls 'rootshock'. Social and
economic relations in space, what Corbridge calls the ties between distant
strangers, have never been more dangerous with deepening poverty across 90%
of Africa, AIDS having produced the most significant interruption to rising
human longevity in recorded history, and the mutual violence of the War on
Terror shredding civil liberties in favour of the securitisation of the
society.
Five questions,then: 1. What is best practice with regard to the regulation
of the toxicity of agriculture and industry 2. What is best practice with
regard to community building in cities and villages 3. What is best
practice in ordering economic relations between rich and poor countries 4.
What is best practice in preventing the transmission of HIV, and in caring
for those infected 5. What is best practice in respecting human rights,
removing the support for terrorism, and detecting genuine threats
It is time to start thinking about best practice rather than trying to
explain the wide range of less then best practice. We should concern
ourselves more with knowing how to go forward than with explaining why in
so many places we refuse even to think of this. This needs a rich exchange
of ideas between geographers in different countries and working on
different places. It requires the revival of Area Studies configured around
key questions, as above, so that it can inform Global and Comparative
Studies. To do this work, geographers will need training in the comparative
method, will need to understand how to make comparisons across different
cultures and societies. This means they will have to know a lot about many
different parts of the world. Our current obsession with exploring the
tools for overlaying maps is all too often a distraction through
abstraction.
|