JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives


COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Archives


COMMUNITYPSYCHUK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Home

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK Home

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK  April 2008

COMMUNITYPSYCHUK April 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Research project!

From:

B Smythe <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The UK Community Psychology Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:57 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (155 lines)

Hi all,

I am a trainee clinical psychologist carrying out a research project into
how clinical psychologists who consider themselves critical of the medical
model continue to work in psychiatric settings.

Please could you spare a few minutes to take a look at the information
below to see if you would be interested in taking part...Thanks!


*** WHAT IS THE RESEARCH PROJECT ABOUT?

Debates about mental distress and psychopathology are often characterised
by two polarised positions. The first has been described as the medical
model (Boyle, 2001; Read et al., 2004). The medical model takes for
granted the idea that mental illness exists as a 'real' entity that can be
studied and summarised accurately by diagnosticians (Pilgrim & Bentall,
1999).

A variety of critics have argued that a lack of scientific reliability and
validity renders psychiatric diagnosis problematic. Some have highlighted
that there is a lack of evidence for the primary causal role of
biochemical abnormalities or genetic factors (Bentall, 2003; Boyle, 2001).
Others have challenged the theoretical assumptions that underpin the
medical model and view 'mental illness' as socially constructed (Parker et
al., 1995). Negative social, ethical and political consequences have been
highlighted as a reason to conceptualise certain types of experiences in
different ways (Harper, 2001).

One alternative to diagnosis-based approaches is to construe mental
distress as an understandable response to psychosocial factors (Johnstone,
2000). Despite the medical model and this psychosocial model being
described as 'fundamentally incompatible' (Johnstone, 2000) they are, to
varying degrees, the two models of understanding mental distress in
operation in the NHS adult mental health system.

Many clinical psychologists are encouraged to develop an appreciation for
the societal context of mental distress (Fleming & Burton, 2001) and to
adopt a critical approach to the utility of medicalised notions (Newness &
Maclachlan, 1996). Clinical psychology has begun to abandon diagnosis in
theory and practice (Boyle, 2007). However, within the adult mental health
system diagnostic concepts of mental illness carry massive political and
professional authority. Diagnoses are central concepts for target setting,
computerised record management and access to services (Berger, 2007;Boyle,
2007).

Clearly, some clinical psychologists find medicalised notions incompatible
with their ethos and professional identity.

A major source of disillusionment and burnout for clinical psychologists
is a lack of support to integrate their psychosocial ideologies into daily
practice mental health practice (Masters et al., 2002). It is possible
that the experience of engagement in practices conflicting with personal
beliefs leads some psychologists to experience discomfort, cognitive
dissonance (Festinger, 1975) and a sense of being personally and
professionally fraudulent (Mollon, 1989).

Clinical psychologists have been encouraged to challenge medicalised
notions ('Practice what we Preach'; The Psychologist, 2007) and take more
action to engage other professionals in 'constructive conflict' over
models of working (BPS, 2007). However, doing this seems to present a set
of professional and professional challenges. Johnstone (1993) listed a
number of ways in which her challenges to biomedical assumptions were
rejected in her day-to-day practice. Gelsthorpe (2007) asserts that many
find this experience disturbing and decide to leave and work elsewhere.


** I WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT....


What dilemmas and challenges are encountered by clinical psychologists
working in AMH systems when the medical model is in conflict with their
personal ideologies.

How have these experiences personally affected this group of professionals
and how have they continued working in the system?


***WHAT WOULD YOU BE ASKED TO DO IF YOU TOOK PART?


I would like to interview clinical psychologists. The interviews will be
conducted over the telephone at a time to suit participants. These
interviews will be recorded so that they can be transcribed.


***WHO CAN TAKE PART?


Participants must currently work as a clinical psychologist in the NHS and
have done so for 2 years or over. They should be working in a psychiatric
setting (i.e. mental health team containing a psychiatrist).

All clinical psychologists will vary in their position on medical model
and psychiatric discourse and I want to interview those who would agree
that they:

(a) Define themselves as being critical of the medical model
(b) Find that this raises dilemmas for them in their work place
(c) Feel they have found ways of managing this


***WHAT SHOULD YOU DO IF YOU WANT TO TAKE PART?


Please e-mail me or telephone me via the contact details below. If you
choose to e-mail me, I would like to know your name and how you would
prefer to be contacted. I will get in touch with you within 2 weeks to
answer any questions you have and to arrange a suitable interview time.


***WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF TAKING PART?


The interview will take up to an hour. The findings of the research will
be written up as an Independent Research Project and submitted to the
university Board of Examiners on order to meet my DClinPsyc training
requirements. It is anticipated that it will also be written up for
publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.


***WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS?

The study is being conducted in accordance with British Psychological
Society and local Research Ethics and Governance Committee guidelines.Your
rights as a participant, including the right to withdraw at any point are
ensured. All content will be anonymised to minimise the possibility of
participant's being identified.




Thank you for taking the time to read this information. Your participation
would be very much appreciated.

For any further information please contact me.


Bill Smythe

Trainee Clinical Psychologist
Canterbury Christ Church University
Salomons (CASP)


E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Mobile: 07723046737 (please leave a message if mobile not answered and I
will call you back)

___________________________________
COMMUNITYPSYCHUK - The discussion list for community psychology in the UK.
To unsubscribe or to change your details visit the website:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/COMMUNITYPSYCHUK.HTML
For any problems or queries, contact the list moderator Rebekah Pratt on [log in to unmask] or Grant Jeffrey on [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager