JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  April 2008

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM April 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Fw: Dworkin on August, _The British Working Class, 1832-1940_

From:

"Deb Ranjan Sinha (Gmail)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Deb Ranjan Sinha (Gmail)

Date:

Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:23:02 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

H-NET BOOK REVIEW
Published by [log in to unmask] (April, 2008)

Andrew August. _The British Working Class, 1832-1940_. Harlow: Pearson
Longman, 2007. ix + 286 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $33.40 (paper),
ISBN 978-0-582-38130-8.

Reviewed for H-Albion by Dennis Dworkin, Department of History, University of 
Nevada

In the 1960s and 1970s, the working class--and particularly the British
working class--had a special place in historical writing. It was at the
center of the new social history and history from below, in large part
because of E. P. Thompson's enormously influential _The Making of the
English Working Class_ (1963). Yet, Thompson's book built on a tradition
of radical historiography in which the British working class was
important to the historical process broadly conceived. It was the
world's first industrial proletariat and central to Karl Marx's
understanding of the historical dynamic of capitalism and the transition
to socialism. The British working class's experience had universal
implications.

Certainly, much has changed since the heyday of the new social and labor
history. The end of communism, the rise of identity politics, the
decline of the labor movement, the advent of post-Fordism, and a host of
other changes have contributed to a declining interest in the working
class within historiography. As a result of the impact of the linguistic
turn, the new cultural history, postmodernism, and postcolonial studies,
the fields of labor and social history are less central than they once
were. Yet, at the same time, there has been an outpouring of theoretical
discussion that has revised our understanding of class, and historians
have produced a more complex and nuanced picture of British
working-class life. The theoretical transformations have been analyzed
at length, including by me in _Class Struggles_ (2007). Andrew August's
_The British Working Class: 1832-1940_ is a highly readable overview of
British working-class history that builds on the achievement of numerous
social, cultural, and feminist historians, while deploying numerous
primary sources to make its principal points.

Theoretically, the book reflects the debates of the 1980s and 1990s,
which pit advocates of cultural and linguistic approaches against those
who supported social and materialist interpretations. August's book
offers a middle ground, building on both positions. It opposes the
automatic assumption, typical of the new social history, which causally
links social being and consciousness, and it draws on cultural
approaches that privilege language and discourse. Yet, August insists
that working people embraced the language of class, because it resonated
with their experience: the environment of home, work, and neighborhood.
Such a perspective is firmly rooted in the materialist tradition of
social and labor history. For August, the primary affiliation of British
workers was in terms of class, but they had multiple identities--most
important, those connected to gender, ethnicity, and region. Where
writers often evoke "British" yet mean "English," August includes in his
narrative not only English but Scottish and Welsh workers as well. Irish
workers are given less space and Jewish immigrant workers virtually none
at all. Their relationship to his narrative raises interesting questions
about the ethnic composition of the British working class and the
criteria for inclusion and exclusion. These questions are by no means
easy to answer.

One of the radical moves made by Thompson was to begin his account of
the early working class by establishing the libertarian and radical
tradition of the free-born Englishman, which shaped the working class's
understanding and response to the early Industrial Revolution. It
demonstrated his rejection of the base/ superstructure model and
stressed his belief that ideology and culture played a constitutive role
in the working-class formation. While August might differentiate himself
from traditional Marxists, his account is structured along
base/superstructure lines. The book is divided chronologically into
three parts, each introduced by shifts in material relationships that
shaped and reshaped working-class culture. Yet, August fully realizes
that such changes can be overemphasized, and he stresses the
continuities that exist in working-class life from one phase to the
next. The first part of August's book covers the early Industrial
Revolution and the years of the long Victorian boom. Here, he stresses
the importance of population movements and growth, which produced
intensive urban expansion. Workers faced overcrowding, poor sanitary
conditions, and high mortality. In this context, family was the dominant
relationship, and people often lived at home for extended periods.
Although a minority of workers was unionized, and unions had to struggle
to be tolerated, there was a continual struggle over wages and workplace
control. Workers fought within the capitalist system rather than against
it. They spent their limited leisure time at feasts and wakes, and they
played street football. These forms of entertainment offended
middle-class notions of respectability, and middle-class and some
working-class reformers wanted to put a stop to them. Working-class
people created their own institutions--cooperatives and friendly
societies--and political movements, notably Chartism, but they were also
hostile to the Poor Laws and the increasing presence of the police. The
book's second part covers the period between the Depression of the 1870s
and World War I. Following the Victorian boom, British capitalists
experienced intensified competition and shrinking profits. They
responded by using more productive technologies, stricter work
discipline, greater reliance on piece rates, and higher levels of the
labor of women and youth. The working class accordingly joined unions at
an unprecedented rate, and the "new unions" of unskilled workers engaged
in increasing levels of strike action. The period following the 1870s
solidified the traditional working-class way of life, founded on dense
and crowded conditions, the doctrine of separate spheres in the
household, and mutuality and solidarity. In contrast to the privatized
world of the middle class, the leisure of working people was public,
involving street life, fairs, gambling, pubs (although reduced amount of
time were spent there), music halls, and football matches. Workers were
becoming more "respectable," increasingly drawn to self-help
organizations emphasizing education and religion. Perhaps the most
important aspect of the first two parts of the book is the way in which
August integrates recent feminist historiography on the working class
into his account. He captures the tension in working-class life between
its embrace of the middle-class ideology of separate spheres and the
fact that many working-class families depended on the wages of husband
and wife to make ends meet. Industrial capitalists, who increasingly
found women's labor appealing because it led to a reduction of wages,
were confronted by skilled male workers who insisted that they alone
were responsible for producing the family wage. As August points out,
unions, which privileged gender conflict over class solidarity, often
shunned women. However, he might have also have given some space to
instances of cooperation between male and female workers. The third part
of the book is largely concerned with the period of World War I and the
interwar years that followed. Following the war, old patterns of
working-class life persisted in the midst of important changes. Despite
high levels of unemployment, many workers had smaller families and more
disposable income, developed better nutritional habits, and lived in
better housing on new housing estates. With the shift in economic life
from textiles and coal to cars and electrical engineering, population
movements took place as well. Workers confronted the intensified
exploitation of labor and acceleration in deskilling. The shift from the
old industries of the Industrial Revolution to such industries as
automobiles was detrimental to unions, and high levels of unemployment
contributed to a reduction in wages. While union membership ebbed and
flowed in the interwar years, the British government supported the
process of collective bargaining but was often hostile to working-class
militancy. August's book includes a thought-provoking discussion of
working-class political affiliations. Working-class people could be
militant, but their class affiliations did not lend themselves to
embracing radical political ideologies. Indeed, as August points out, a
segment of working-class people were not only steadfastly Tories, but
they also could be deeply patriotic, turning out in large numbers for
Empire Day and the Coronation of 1937. Ultimately, for August, "the
informal, everyday politics of households, neighbourhoods and workplaces
pervaded working-class life far more than party politics or militant
activism. Hierarchies of reputation and respect distinguished households
and whole streets in working-class districts from one another" (p. 236).
Such a perspective provides justification for giving short shrift to
workers' involvement in socialist politics, which, as August rightly
points out, was a minority trend. But, if traditional accounts of the
British working class have exaggerated its connection to socialism, he
has perhaps bent the stick too far in the other direction. Socialism
might be a minority current in working-class life, but its relationship
to the majority culture was by no means insignificant. In short,
August's _The British Working Class, 1832-1940_ is a readable synthesis
of recent scholarship that skillfully deploys the voices of
working-class people to make its principle points. While scholars in the
field will be mostly familiar with his primary and secondary sources,
the book is an excellent introduction for those less knowledgeable and
is ideally suited for the classroom. In provincializing the British
working class, August has performed an important scholarly task.



Copyright � 2008 by H-Net, all rights reserved. H-Net permits the
redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational
purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web
location, date of publication, originating list, and H-Net: Humanities &
Social Sciences Online. For any other proposed use, contact the Reviews
editorial staff at [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager