Although this is not a very important issue..., I am a bit surprised by
Gerard's insistance for a 'stop calling rmsd "rms deviation"'. Isn'it a
general term in statistical studies, valid for distances separating
homologous atoms as well as for any other factor (B factors for example) ?
Philippe Dumas
IBMC-CNRS, UPR9002
15, rue Rene Descartes 67084 Strasbourg cedex
tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 70 02
[log in to unmask]
-----Message d'origine-----
De : CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]]De la part de
Gerard DVD Kleywegt
Envoye : Monday, April 07, 2008 7:20 PM
A : [log in to unmask]
Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] Help with Superpose results
>Is the rms xyz displacement equivalent to an rmsd??
yes. it is in fact a better name than "rms deviation", although i think
'root-mean-square distance' is even better, as it says exactly what you
calculate.
think of it like this, the formula for rmsd is:
RMSD = square-root [ SUM(atoms) { (x1-x2)^2 + (y1-y2)^2 + (z1-z2)^2 } /
Natoms
]
now, "(x1-x2)^2 + (y1-y2)^2 + (z1-z2)^2" is the Square of the Distance
between
two equivalenced atoms in structure 1 and 2; adding them for all pairs of
equivalenced atoms and dividing by the number of atoms gives you the Mean
Squared Distance; finally, taking the square root yields the
Root-Mean-Square
Distance, or RMSD
so, people, can we all please stop calling rmsd "rms deviation" - it really
is
an "rms distance" (or "rms displacement"). you could argue that the formula
gives some kind of rms coordinate deviation, but in that case you ought to
divide by 3*Natoms instead.
(having said that, the term "RMS B displacement" sounds positively silly!)
--dvd
******************************************************************
Gerard J. Kleywegt
[Research Fellow of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences]
Dept. of Cell & Molecular Biology University of Uppsala
Biomedical Centre Box 596
SE-751 24 Uppsala SWEDEN
http://xray.bmc.uu.se/gerard/ mailto:[log in to unmask]
******************************************************************
The opinions in this message are fictional. Any similarity
to actual opinions, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
******************************************************************
|